Desolate magnificence -The Space Review

LRO images on display at the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum [Dwayne Day/The Space Review].

Dwayne Day

The Space Review

Right now Washington, DC’s museums are filled with the noise of hormonal teenagers on their spring break trips to the nation’s capital. They run around aimlessly, oblivious to their surroundings, or sprawl on the dirty carpet absorbed in their own little worlds. Later, in May, the senior class trips will show up, and those older students are a little less noisy, a little more focused, but they too will probably not be all that interested in the actual museums, even if they take their noses out of their cellphones for more than a second or two. But just maybe, perhaps, one or two of them may accidentally wander into one of the National Air and Space Museum’s new exhibits and they might quiet down for a moment and see something both familiar and alien.

The exhibit is titled “A New Moon Rises” and it is a display of large format photographs from NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter featuring the Moon in all its panchromatic glory. You could look at most of these photos on your computer screen, but seeing them enlarged and displayed on a museum wall like works of art is an entirely different experience.

The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, or LRO, was launched in 2009 and has been chugging away ever since. If nothing breaks, in four or five years the spacecraft will probably run out of fuel and, because the Moon’s gravity field is uneven, it will ultimately fall and silently crash into the surface after more than a decade in orbit.

- Read the full article online, in the latest issue of The Space Review, HERE.

CRaTER: Lunar Proton Albedo Anomalies

Figure 1. Top: Lunar albedo proton yield map (cylindrical projection) with anomalous yield regions labeled “A” through “E”. Regions A (Mare Serenitatis) and B (Oceanus Procellarum) are both centered near the boundaries of mare regions. Regions C, D and E are all in the highlands on the far side of the Moon. Bottom: Visible global composite image from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC).

LUNAR PROTON ALBEDO ANOMALIES:
SOIL, SURVEYORS, AND STATISTICS

J.K. Wilson, N. Schwadron and H. E. Spence, et al.
Space Science Center
University of New Hampshire, Durham

Introduction: Since the launch of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) in 2009, the Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) has been mapping albedo protons (~100 MeV) coming from the Moon [1,2].

These protons are produced by nuclear spallation, a consequence of galactic cosmic ray (GCR) bombardment of the lunar regolith. Just as spalled neutrons and gamma rays reveal elemental abundances in the lunar regolith [3-6], albedo protons may be a complimentary method for mapping compositional variations across the Moon’s surface.

Albedo Proton Yield: The CRaTER instrument simultaneously detects albedo protons from the Moon and GCRs arriving from the zenith direction. We divide the number of albedo protons observed over each point on the Moon by the number of GCRs detected over the same location to produce a map of the yield of albedo protons.

We presently find that the lunar maria have an average proton yield which is 0.9% ± 0.3% higher than the average yield in the highlands; this is consistent with some neutron data that shows a similar yield dichotomy due to differences in the average atomic weight between mare regolith and highland regolith [7].

Map Features: There are cases where two or more adjacent pixels (15° × 15°) in the map have significantly anomalous yields above or below the mean.

These include two high-yielding regions in the maria, and three low-yielding regions in the far-side highlands. Some of the regions could be artifacts of Poisson noise, but for completeness we consider possible effects from compositional anomalies in the lunar regolith, including pyroclastic flows, antipodes of fresh craters, and so-called "red spots" which are associated with volcanic domes. We also consider man-made landers and crash sites that may have brought elements not normally found in the lunar regolith.

References: [1] Wilson, J. K. et al. (2012) JGR, 117, E00H23. [2] Spence, H. E. et al. (2012) Space Weather, 11, 643-650. [3] Feldman W. C. et al. (1998) Science, 281, 1496-1500. [4] Gasnault, O. et al. (2001) GRL, 28, 3797-3800. [5] Maurice, S. et al. (2004) JGR, 109, E07S04. [6] Mitrofanov, I. G. et al. (2010) Science, 330, 483-486. [7] Litvak, M. L. et al. (2012) JGR, 117, E00H22.

Hell Q

LROC NAC mosaic M1164853645RL, LRO orbit 23561, September 8, 2014; spacecraft and cameras slewed 3° from nadir, 33.17° angle of incidence, 71 cm resolution from 68.29 km over 33.07°S, 355.72°E [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Hell Q (3.75 km; 33°S, 355.53°E) seems younger than Tycho, standing out as it does in the nearside Southern Highlands northeast of the more famous astrobleme. 

There seems little doubt the effect of the larger, far more widespread blast zone from Tycho changed the face of this contemporary but pre-existing smaller crater. The chevron effect left grooves untouched down stream and tore away a chunk of the northeast rim, morphologies apparently perpendicular to a straight line drawn southwest to the more spectacular, 109 million year-old Tycho.

View full resolution views, of a variety of sizes, HERE.

Postdoctoral Researcher positions, SwRI

Far-UV albedos show some agreement with epithermal neutron suppression regions [NASA/GSFC/SwRI].

Erin Rogers, PHR

Sr. Specialist

Employment Operations

Southwest Research Institute

The UV imaging spectrograph group at Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) is seeking postdoctoral planetary scientists to join our team's investigations of a variety of science questions using far-UV observations. 

Topics of study include:

1. Characterization of volatiles within permanently shaded regions (PSRs) at the lunar poles with the Lyman Alpha Mapping Project (LAMP) imaging spectrograph on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO); 
2. Imaging Jupiter's powerful auroral emissions with the Juno UV Spectrograph (UVS)
3. Studying the atmosphere of Pluto with the New Horizons Alice instrument
4. Analysis of Hubble campaign observations in search of water vapor plumes on Europa
5. Instrument development work related to the Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE) UVS investigation and other future UV/optical projects in Astrophysics, Planetary Science, Heliophysics, and Earth Sciences.

• Candidates are encouraged to develop their own additional research projects.

Candidates must have experience with imaging and/or spectroscopy from space-based or ground-based observatories; strong programming skills with Interactive Data Language (IDL) is preferred. A background in scientific analysis and publications related to one or more of the topics listed above is highly desirable. Specific tasks include: analyzing UV spectral imaging datasets; assist with planning future observations; publishing results in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at professional meetings; development of concepts and new technologies for UV/VIS/IR instrumentation and assist ing with flight instrument integration, test and calibration tasks, and leading and/or assisting proposal writing for new business.

All candidates must use the swri.jobs website to prepare and submit applications.  They may reference job number 15-01143 or utilize the following job link:

https://resapp.swri.org/ResApp/Job_Search_Results.aspx?DETAIL=15-01143

Hydrogen retention on pole-facing slopes

Lovelace (57.06 km; 82.08°N, 250.49°E) crater, of the Moon's far north, hosts a signature of volatiles within permanently shadowed regions (PSR) on the inside slope of its south wall. Long-term studies of the Moon's reserves of hydrogen and other volatiles, made possible by the extended science missions of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), show a diurnal cycle of hydrogen retention on pole-facing slopes, perhaps a result of neutral hydrogen from the Sun. [NASA/GSFC/ASU/LOLA/PDS].

Bill Steigerwald

Goddard Space Flight Center

Space travel is difficult and expensive – it would cost thousands of dollars to launch a bottle of water to the moon. The recent discovery of hydrogen-bearing molecules, possibly including water, on the Moon has explorers excited because these deposits could be mined if they are sufficiently abundant, sparing the considerable expense of bringing water from Earth.

Karnik

Lunar water could be used for drinking or its components – hydrogen and oxygen – could be used to manufacture important products on the surface that future visitors to the moon will need, like rocket fuel and breathable air.

Recent observations by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) spacecraft indicate these deposits may be slightly more abundant on crater slopes in the southern hemisphere that face the lunar South Pole.

"There’s an average of about 23 parts-per-million-by-weight (ppmw) more hydrogen on Pole-Facing Slopes (PFS) than on Equator-Facing Slopes (EFS)," said Timothy McClanahan of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.

This is the first time a widespread geochemical difference in hydrogen abundance between PFS and EFS on the moon has been detected. It is equal to a one-percent difference in the neutron signal detected by LRO's Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector (LEND) instrument. McClanahan is lead author of a paper about this research published online October 19 in the journal Icarus.

The hydrogen-bearing material is volatile (easily vaporized), and may be in the form of water molecules (two hydrogen atoms bound to an oxygen atom) or hydroxyl molecules (an oxygen bound to a hydrogen) that are loosely bound to the lunar surface. The cause of the discrepancy between PFS and EFS may be similar to how the Sun mobilizes or redistributes frozen water from warmer to colder places on the surface of the Earth, according to McClanahan.

"Here in the northern hemisphere, if you go outside on a sunny day after a snowfall, you'll notice that there's more snow on north-facing slopes because they lose water at slower rates than the more sunlit south-facing slopes" said McClanahan. "We think a similar phenomenon is happening with the volatiles on the moon – PFS don't get as much sunlight as EFS, so this easily vaporized material stays longer and possibly accumulates to a greater extent on PFS."

The team observed the greater hydrogen abundance on PFS in the topography of the moon's southern hemisphere, beginning at between 50 and 60 degrees south latitude.

The Moon's polar south and its neutron suppression zpmes, indicative of the presence of hydrogen (inside and outside permanent shadow) mapped from data collected from the LRO LEND instrument over two and a half years [NASA/GSFC/SVS/Pockocmoc].

Slopes closer to the South Pole show a larger hydrogen concentration difference. Also, hydrogen was detected in greater concentrations on the larger PFS, about 45 ppmw near the poles. Spatially broader slopes provide more detectable signals than smaller slopes. The result indicates that PFS have greater hydrogen concentrations than their surrounding regions. Also, the LEND measurements over the larger EFS don't contrast with their surrounding regions, which indicates EFS have hydrogen concentrations that are equal to their surroundings, according to McClanahan. The team thinks more hydrogen may be found on PFS in northern hemisphere craters as well, but they are still gathering and analyzing LEND data for this region.

There are different possible sources for the hydrogen on the moon. Comets and some asteroids contain large amounts of water, and impacts by these objects may bring hydrogen to the moon. Hydrogen-bearing molecules could also be created on the lunar surface by interaction with the solar wind. The solar wind is a thin stream of gas that's constantly blown off the Sun. Most of it is hydrogen, and this hydrogen may interact with oxygen in silicate rock and dust on the moon to form hydroxyl and possibly water molecules. After these molecules arrive at the moon, it is thought they get energized by sunlight and then bounce across the lunar surface; and they get stuck, at least temporarily, in colder and more shadowy areas.

Since the 1960's scientists thought that only in permanently shadowed areas in craters near the lunar poles was it cold enough to accumulate this volatile material, but recent observations by a number of spacecraft, including LRO, suggest that hydrogen on the moon is more widespread.

It's uncertain if the hydrogen is abundant enough to economically mine. "The amounts we are detecting are still drier than the driest desert on Earth," said McClanahan. However, the resolution of the LEND instrument is greater than the size of most PFS, so smaller PFS slopes, perhaps approaching yards in size, may have significantly higher abundances, and indications are that the greatest hydrogen concentrations are within the permanently shaded regions, according to McClanahan.

The team made the observations using LRO's LEND instrument, which detects hydrogen by counting the number of subatomic particles called neutrons flying off the lunar surface. The neutrons are produced when the lunar surface gets bombarded by cosmic rays. Space is permeated by cosmic rays, which are high-speed particles produced by powerful events like flares on the Sun or exploding stars in deep space. Cosmic rays shatter atoms in material near the lunar surface, generating neutrons that bounce from atom to atom like a billiard ball. Some neutrons happen to bounce back into space where they can be counted by neutron detectors.

Neutrons from cosmic ray collisions have a wide range of speeds, and hydrogen atoms are most efficient at stopping neutrons in their medium speed range, called epithermal neutrons. Collisions with hydrogen atoms in the lunar regolith reduce the numbers of epithermal neutrons that fly into space. The more hydrogen present, the fewer epithermal neutrons the LEND detector will count.

Neutron suppression information in the Moon's polar north is, as yet, less granular than data mapped in greater detail over the far South. Here neutron suppression is overlaid on a LROC WAC mosaic with permanently shadowed regions (PSRs) outlined in black. Again, the occurrence of hydrogen is related to sunlight but not necessarily tied to its total absence.

The team interpreted a widespread decrease in the number of epithermal neutrons detected by LEND as a signal that hydrogen is present on PFS. They combined data from LEND with lunar topography and illumination maps derived from LRO's LOLA instrument (Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter), and temperature maps from LRO's Diviner instrument (Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment) to discover the greater hydrogen abundance and associated surface conditions on PFS.

In addition to seeing if the same pattern exists in the moon's northern hemisphere, the team wants to see if the hydrogen abundance changes with the transition from day to night. If so, it would substantiate existing evidence of a very active production and cycling of hydrogen on the lunar surface, according to McClanahan.

The research was funded by NASA's LRO mission. LEND was supplied by the Russian Federal Space Agency Roscosmos. Launched on June 18, 2009, LRO has collected a treasure trove of data with its seven powerful instruments, making an invaluable contribution to our knowledge about the moon. LRO is managed by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, for the Science Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington.

LRO could remain in present orbit 7 or more years

Because the Moon is lumpy and uneven, it's possible nothing has ever been in close-orbit around our companion planet as long as the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Certainly nothing built by humans. Few deep space missions have delivered as much return on their investment. The sheer volume of data returned by LRO exceeds all deep space missions ever launched combined, several times over [NASA/GSFC/SVS].

THE SECOND EXTENDED SCIENCE MISSION
FOR THE LUNAR RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER:
STATUS, SCIENCE GOALS, AND DATA DELIVERIES

Noah E. Petro and John W. Keller

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Solar System Exploration Division

The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has been orbiting the Moon for over five years. In that time, data from the seven instruments onboard the spacecraft have made significant advances in our understanding of the Moon and its environment. In September 2014 LRO completed its first Extended Science Mission (ESM) and began a second ESM (ESM2). 

During the both ESM and ESM2, LRO has been in a quasi-stable, eccentric orbit of ~40 x 180 km with a periapse near the South Pole (Figure 1). This orbit enables high resolution measurements around the South Pole. 

The LRO Project is considering a maneuver in early 2015 to lower the periapse in order to further improve measurements over the South Pole, particularly by the LOLA instrument. Based on the current annual consumption of fuel, the spacecraft could remain in its current orbit for at least 7 more years.

FIGURE 1. Orbital history of LRO since arriving at the Moon in 2009. LRO now employs yearly station keeping (SK) maneuvers in order to maintain its orbit. There are also periodic momentum unload burns that use small quantities of fuel.

LRO Operations: As part of the approval for continued operations, LRO was directed by NASA HQ to terminate operations of the Mini-RF instrument. All of LRO’s remaining six instruments are operating nominally, and have experienced no significant degradation since beginning the ESM over two years ago.

During extended operations the LRO spacecraft has performed exceptionally well, with 98.4% uptime during the life of the mission. LRO retains sufficient fuel quantities so that its current orbit could be maintained for at least 8 years, if not longer.

LRO Science In ESM2: An overarching theme of ESM2 for LRO is that of change. A number of measurements have shown changes to the lunar surface and to its environment. LRO will focus on the five following themes that each build on prior observations from LRO, LADEE, GRAIL, and the Moon Mineralogy Mapper. Each theme has numerous questions that are address, an example few are given here.

1. Transport of Volatiles. How are volatile elements and compounds distributed, transported, and sequestered?
2. Contemporary Surface Change. What causes changes in the flux and intensities of meteoroid impacts onto terrestrial planets.
3. Regolith Evolution. Characterize planetary surfaces to understand how they are modified by geologic processes.
4. Probing the Interior from Observations of the Surface. Characterize planetary interiors to understand how they differentiate and evolve from their initial state
5. Interactions with the Space Environment.  How is surface material modified exogenically? How do exospheres form, evolve, and interact with the space environment?

LRO Data: The LRO instrument teams will continue to deliver data to the PDS every three months. As of the beginning of 2015 over 575 Tb of data have been placed into the PDS [1]. This data volume contains a range of products, including higher level maps, mosaics, and derived products. The PDS has made available the Lunar Orbital Data Explorer [2], a mapbased tool to search for finding and downloading PDS science data of LRO as well as other recent lunar missions.

In addition to the PDS holdings, several of the LRO instrument teams have additional products and tools available on their websites (Table 1).

Several global map products have recently been added to the PDS, here we highlight a few that are new in the last year. The Mini-RF team has assembled a global mosaic of their monostatic measurements [3].

For the first time we have global radar data for the Moon, data that clearly shows variations in rock abundance and surface texture over both the near and farside (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2. Mini-RF global mosaic of the Circular Polarization Ratio (CPR), one of the number of Mini-RF mosaic products now available online.

The LROC team regularly adds new products to the PDS via the team webpage (Table 1), including shapefiles, global mosaics, NAC-derived DEM’s, and NAC mosaics of selected targets. Recently the LROC team has made available a number of anaglyphs (Figure 3) showcasing the ability of the LRO spacecraft and the LROC team to precisely target the NACs.

FIGURE 3. Red-Blue anaglyph of the central peak of Euler crater.  The LROC team has made a number of anaglyphs available on their website (Table 1).

The LAMP team has a number of polar products available, including FUV ratio maps of both poles (Figure 4). These following maps are available at a resolution of 240 meters per pixel; Lyman-α (119.57–125.57 nm), Long (130–190 nm), On-band (130–155 nm), Off-band (155–190 nm), H2O Absorption Feature Depth Maps made by a Ratio map of on/off band.

FIGURE 4. LAMP Lyman-α map of the South Pole. LRO has focused on volatiles at the South Pole since arriving at the Moon 5+ years ago.

Table 1. LRO teams and their websites

LRO Project	lunar.gsfc.nasa.gov
Outreach	lunar.gsfc.nasa.gov/education.html
CRaTER	crater.sr.unh.edu
Diviner	diviner.ucla.edu
LAMP	boulder.swri.edu/lamp/
LEND	l503.iki.rssi.ru/LEND-en.html
LOLA	lunar.gsfc.nasa.gov/lola/ imbrium.mit.edu
LROC	lroc.sese.asu.edu
Mini-RF	nasa.gov/mission_pages/Mini-RF/main/index.html

Use LRO Data!

The LRO Project has begun holding a series of data users workshops with the goal of helping the community work with the large volume of LRO data. Presentations given at the workshops are archived at the LRO website [4]. Questions regarding the access and use of LRO data can be directed to the authors of this abstract.

References:  [1] LRO PDS Archive, (http://pdsgeosciences.wustl.edu/missions/lro/).
[2] Lunar Orbital Data Explorer, (http://ode.rsl.wustl.edu/moon/).
[3] Cahill, J. T. S., et al., (2014) Icarus, 243, 173-190.
[4] LRO Data Resources, (http://lunar.gsfc.nasa.gov/resources.html).

20th Release of LRO data to the PDS

It's time in the Sun finally came, last September. Marius K (3.61 km; 9.4°N, 309.3°E), south of its namesake, southeast of Reiner Gamma in Oceanus Procellarum, was among the few places on the lunar surface not previously imaged at high-resolution by LROC cameras. The closer look came at the end of the observational period in the latest, 20th release to the Planetary Data System, December 15, covering roughly mid-June through mid-September 2014. LROC NAC observation M1165144506R, LRO orbit 23602, September 12, 2014; 17.25° incidence angle, resolution 1.07 meters from 105 km over 9.93°N, 309.4°E [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].See a larger reproduction HERE.

Teams operating sensors on-board the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, including the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC), are currently updating the Planetary Data System with another treasure trove of records covering the three months from mid-June through mid-September.

The will be the 20th such Release to the PDS of information gathered from the remarkable LRO which has been orbiting the Moon since June 2009.

Of course, it must be added, this isn't the first time Marius K, transected by Procellarum wrinkle ridges, has been imaged by the LROC Wide Angle Camera. By way of comparison, the small crater is seen here at center in this 34 km-wide field of view in a LROC WAC monochrome (566 nm) mosaic from two sequential passes on July 24, 2011; 63.3 incidence angle, resolution 58.7 meters from 42.16 km [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Release 20 of Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter data is now online at the Geosciences Node. This release includes new data acquired between June 15 and September 14, 2014, for CRaTER, Diviner, LAMP, LEND, LOLA, and LROC. Data can be found on the Geosciences Node LRO page. The Lunar Orbital Data Explorer allows one reliable way of searching and downloading LRO data.

Another image really requiring the viewer to select a full-size option to appreciate its detail. A roughly ten kilometer-wide view of the Reiner Gamma contact zone with the Marius Hills, in Oceanus Procellarum. From 20th release of LROC data released to the Planetary Data System (PDS), December 15, 2014. LROC NAC mosaic M1158112330LR, LRO orbit 22614, June 22, 2014; 67.62° incidence angle, resolution 1.07 meters from 105.12 km over 10.32°N, 304.48°E [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Full resolution view from the mosaic immediately above, showing on of the out-lying Marius domes apparently subject to the same influences that keep the Reiner Gamma swirl optically immature. Those studying processes on the Moon highly anticipate the tri-monthly releases of LRO data to the PDS, and hasten to search out familiar locations for a fresh perspective, or a first high-resolution view, even more than five years after LRO began operations.

Updates and instructions, etc., are regularly posted to the PDS Lunar Node, HERE.

The Moon from Earth in 2015

From the Science Visualization Studio (SVS), NASA Goddard

Moon Phase and Libration, 2015 (southern hemisphere)

Visualizations by Ernie Wright, December 9, 2014

Mottled mound at Firsov

Low-angle incidence view of a curious mound on the floor of Firsov crater (51 km; 4.204°N, 112.697°E). 2.2 km field of view from LROC NAC observation M187506567R [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Hiroyuki Sato
LROC News System

Firsov is a 51-km diameter crater located in the farside highlands, approximately 240 km east of King crater. The depth of Firsov's floor from the rim crest is an impressive 4.5 km (that’s 2.5 times the depth of the Grand Canyon in Arizona).

The bright (highly reflective) mound on the crater floor is about 200 meters in height, and 2.5 km in diameter, and really catches your eye. The central portion of the crater floor is relatively flat, suggesting that it at least partially consists of a long-solidified pool of impact-melt; the mound is located within this melt pond deposit.

46 km-wide field of view showing  the high-reflectance mound feature, near center of FriFirsovater, from LROC WAC monochrome (643 nm) observation M176892340CE, LRO orbit 11204, November 25, 2011; 62.51 incidence, resolution 58.62 meters from 43.41 km [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

A number of previous Featured Image posts explored the origins of mounds occurring inside impact craters. Hypotheses include volcanic eruptions, impact debris, and the squeeze-ups of impact melt.

Today's Featured Image highlights the degradation of these mounds, instead of their origin. The low-incidence angle of the top image (~9°) highlights differences in albedo on the mound top, what causes these bright patches?

Perhaps, as the mound surface degrades over time, the high-reflectance materials are exposed unevenly, for example, due to a bumpy surface morphology, where local, topographically high portions are exposed faster and newly exposed material is immature (and thus brighter).

Alternatively, the mound may be constructed from non-uniform materials and/or compositions that exhibit a range of reflectivities. However, scientists believe that during impacts any compositional differences within the target are homogenized in melt deposits. This mound would be a great place to examine that hypothesis.

The bright mound southeast of center on the floor of Firsov is not the only albedo "anomaly" in the vicinity of Firsov crater. This cycle of overlapping fields of view, juxtapositioning data ranging from LROC WAC-derived elevation models to Clementine UV-VIS color ratio maps from 1994, brings into stark relief the unnamed Copernican era crater northeast of Firsov, and also the dramatic patch of albedo swirls coincident with a locally intense crustal magnetism, photographed from orbit by the crew of Apollo 10. It seems distant and detached, but still these swirls are likely associated with the widely-scattered swirl fields farther to the west at Mare Marginis, on the opposite side of the Moon from the energetic basin-forming impact that formed Mare Orientale 3.1 billion years ago [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

View full-window, HERE.

Related Posts:
Shiny Mound
Kagami-mochi on the Moon!
Pancakes in a melt pond
Donut Holes
The Domes of Stevinus Crater
That's a Relief

Exploring the lunar subsurface

Two collapsed segments of a lava tube run from the southwest to the northeast, in the Rimae Prinz-Harbinger mountain region of Oceanus Procellarum (27.46°N, 318.33°E). These collapsed segments may provide access to the subsurface, which has never been directly sampled. The average width of the collapsed segments is ~650 meters. The lava tube is ~50 meters deep, seen in this 7 km-wide field of view from a mosaic of unreleased 2014 LROC NAC observation M1165080128 (L&R) [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

H. Meyer

LROC News System

A lava tube is a volcanic conduit through which lava travels beneath the hardened crust of a lava flow. The presence of lava tubes on the Moon and beyond are inferred based on observations of terrestrial lava tubes, such as those found in Hawaii. Oftentimes, a rille suddenly disappears only to reappear a short distance away.

These are called discontinuous rilles and are thought to be areas where a lava tube collapsed. Collapsed lava tube segments may provide access to the subsurface, which is exciting as a possible site to collect rock samples that remain unaltered due to surface weathering (radiation, thermal cycling, micrometeorite bombardment).

Slightly differing, slightly lower resolution, 11.5 x 15.9 km field of view of the area of interest from a mosaic of LROC Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) observation M1152143995RL, LRO orbit 21776, April 14, 2014; resolution averages 1.33 meters per pixel, incidence angle 48.9° from 132.14 km over 26.86°N, 318.11°E. View the original 8706 x 12008 and an assortment of other sizes HERE [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Sunrise over Mons Harbinger. 65 km-wide field of view from mosaic of three LROC Wide Angle Camera (WAC) monochrome (604 nm) observations, swept up during three sequential orbital passes, December 7, 2011,  from 43 km; resolution 58 meters per pixel, incidence 77° [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Context for LROC Featured Image released November 6, 2014, field of view in red, full field swept up in LROC NAC observations M1152143995R & L in yellow. LROC WAC mosaic [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

The lava tube from the LROC Featured Image released November 5, 2014 is located to the west of Montes Harbinger, a large kipuka in Oceanus Procellarum, and to the east of the Rimae Prinz region.

The Rimae Prinz region displays exquisite sinuous rilles as well as other elongate depressions, indicating that there could be other lava tubes in the area.

The Prinz, Rimae Prinz and Vera vent region, east of Aristarchus Plateau. The area of interest is marked with a yellow arrow, upper right in this roughly 120 km square field of view from the LROC WAC 100m global mosaic. the Vera vent 'cobra head' of Rima Prinz I rille (on the north-northeast rim of basalt-inundated Prinz crater, at lower left), is the subject of intense study (see HERE). [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

The entire region, pictured above, is of interest for exploration for several reasons. The diversity of volcanic landforms in the area can tell scientists much about the volcanic history of the Moon. By collecting samples from the surface and subsurface in this region and by careful mapping on-site, scientists can better characterize the diverse basaltic lava flows in terms of both age and composition, which also helps us understand the timing and evolution of lunar volcanism and possible heterogeneities in the lunar mantle. Any time a sample is taken from a site on the Moon and age-dated, it can also be used to calibrate crater densities that are currently used to remotely age-date surfaces in the absence of direct sampling (both on the Moon and other planets).

Lava tubes are of particular interest in terms of human exploration because they are not only scientifically valuable, but they might also provide shielding from the radiation that poses a hazard to future explorers. Furthermore, the region surrounding the lava tube from this Featured Image also hosts large pyroclastic deposits, which are a potential in situ resource that will be critical to sustaining a human presence on the Moon.

Scientists and engineers are looking into the possibility of using the natural structure of the lava tube and associated resources (ISRU) to our advantage to construct habitats for explorers.

Explore the full NAC mosaic here! How many features of interest do you see?

Related Posts:
Source Vent for Rima Prinz I

Partially flooded crater rim near Rimae Prinz

Rimae Prinze Region - Constellation ROI

Rilles as far as the eye can see in Prinz!

Marius Hills Pit - Lave Tube Skylight?

Tadpole and Lava Tube

Sinuous Chain of Depressions

How Common Are Mare Pit Craters?

Diversity of Basaltic Lunar Volcanism

Collapsing Tube

Natural Bridge on the Moon

New Views of Lunar Pits

Discontiguous Rilles

Addendum: Under mid to late afternoon sunlight, another LROC WAC mosaic, swept up under conditions remarkably similar in scale with the third image from above, from the same period of low altitude opportunities the LRO mission afforded during orbital maneuvers in the second half of 2011. Differing sun-moon-spacecraft phase angles allows for an excellent comparison. This particular mosaic was also assembled from LROC WAC observations, but five months earlier, and from three sequential orbital passes, at 43 km altitude. The resolution is 59 meters, incidence angle 64° [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

LADEE impact crater found

LADEE impact site on the eastern rim of Sundman V crater, the spacecraft was heading west when it impacted the surface. The image was created by ratioing two images, one taken before the impact and another after the impact. The bright area shows the impact point and the ejecta (things that have changed between the time of the two images). The ejecta form a V shaped pattern extending to the northwest from the impact point. Ratio constructed with LROC images M1163066820RE and M1101816767RE [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Mark Robinson
Principal Investigator
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC)
Arizona State University

The Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) was launched from Wallops Island on 6 September 2013 at 11:27 EDT and was visible over much of the eastern coast of the United States. The spacecraft was 2.37 m (7.8 ft) high and 1.85 m (6.1 ft) wide with a mass of 383 kg (844 lb) including the fuel.

After expending most of its fuel during its successful exploration of the Moon the spacecraft had a mass of about only 248 kg (547 lb) when it impacted the surface.

Artist's rendition of the LADEE spacecraft in orbit around the Moon [NASA/JAXA/LP].

Originally LADEE was placed into a retrograde, near-equatorial orbit to study the Moon's surface bound exosphere and dust environment. Since the Apollo era of exploration several conflicting ideas and observations concerning the existence (or not) of near-surface and high altitude dust were debated, and thus one of LADEE’s key science goals was to search for dust particles high above the surface (no dust was found).

LADEE's engines were fired on 11 April 2014 to adjust the orbit in such a way as to guarantee a farside impact if the spacecraft did not survive the 15 April 2014 eclipse. There was a small worry that if the spacecraft failed during the eclipse and was uncontrollable, it might impact near one of the Apollo sites. Over the subsequent 7 days, the low point in LADEE's orbit decreased resulting in an impact on 18 April 2014.

Before and after images of the LADEE impact site [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

As it passed over the western limb as seen from the Earth, the spacecraft impacted the eastern rim of Sundman V crater (11.85°N, 266.75°E). The impact site (11.8494°N, 266.7507°E) is about 780 m from the crater rim with an altitude of about 2590 m, and was only about 295 meters north of its originally predicted location (based on tracking data).

Like the LADEE spacecraft, the impact crater is small, greater than 3 meters in diameter, barely resolvable by the LROC NAC. Based on impact models, a crater of only about 1.8 m (6 ft) diameter is expected. The crater is very small because, as impacts go, LADEE had a low mass and a low density (0.43 g / cm3 vs. larger than 3.0 g / cm3 for an ordinary chondrite meteorite), and was traveling at only a tenth the speed (1699 m/sec - 3800 mph) of an average asteroid.

LADEE impact crater (centered of image) has a distinctive hour-glass albedo pattern indicative of low angle impacts. Bright material extends to the northwest, while only a minor amount was ejected to the southeast; NAC M1163066820RE [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Because it is so small, the crater is hard to identify among the myriad of small fresh craters that dot the lunar surface. However, as images had been acquired of the impact region before the impact occurred, they could be compared with images acquired after the impact to identify the crater.

Since NAC images are so large (250 megapixels) and the new crater is so small the LROC team coregistered the before and after images (called a temporal pair) and then divided the after image by the before image. In this manner any changes to the surface stick out like a beacon! For the LADEE crater the ejecta forms a triangular pattern primarily downrange (to the west) extending more than 200 meters from the impact site. There is also a small triangular area of ejecta uprange but it extends only about 20-30 meters. The ejecta pattern is oriented WNW consistent with the direction the spacecraft was traveling when it impacted.

Zoomed-in view of the impact site, image is 200 m across, NAC M1163066820RE [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Explore the catalog of LROC close-ups of lunar spacecraft landing and impact sites, HERE.

Related LADEE Posts:
First Science from LADEE (45th LPSC, March 18 2014)
LADEE's (star tracker) images of the Moon (February 14, 2014)
LADEE economy adds 28 days to mission (February 5, 2014)
LROC captures LADEE from 9,000 meters (January 30, 2014)
Red Moon, Blue Moon Dwayne Day, The Space Review (December 3, 2013)
LADEE begins collecting data (November 22, 2013)
LADEE transitioning out of commissioning phase (November 6, 2013)
Apollo 12 ALSEP first to measure dust accumulation (November 21, 2013)
Chang'e-3 & LADEE: The Role of Serendipity (October 31, 2013)
LADEE LLCD sets new data record (October 25, 2013)
Measuring almost nothing, looking for the almost invisible (October 16, 2013)
LADEE legacies (September 7, 2013)
LADEE Prelaunch Mission Briefing (September 6, 2013)
ESA prepares for LADEE (July 31, 2013)
LADEE arrives at Wallops Island (June 5, 2013)
LADEE ready to baseline dusty lunar exosphere (June 5, 2013)
First laser comm system ready for launch on LADEE (March 16, 2013)
LADEE project manager update (February 6, 2013)
The Mona Lisa test for LADEE communications (January 21, 2013)
Toxicity of lunar dust (July 2, 2012)
Expectations for the LADEE LDEX (March 23, 2012)
The Dust Management Project (August 9, 2010)
LADEE architecture and mission design (July 6, 2010)
DesertRatS testing electrodynamic dust shield (July 5, 2010)
Dust transport and its importance in the origin of lunar swirls (February 21, 2010)
Dust accumulation on Apollo laser reflectors may indicate a surprisingly fast and
more dynamic lunar exosphere (February 16, 2010)
NASA applies low cost lessons to LADEE (January 18, 2010)
Nanotech advances in lunar dust mitigation (August 19, 2009)
Moon dust hazard influenced by Sun's elevation (April 17, 2009)
LADEE launch by Orbital from Wallops Island (April 14, 2009)
Understanding the activation and solution properties of lunar dust
for future lunar habitation (March 2, 2009)
Respiratory toxicity of lunar highland dust (January 19, 2009)
Toxicological effects of moon dust (June 25, 2008)
Moon dust and duct tape (April 22, 2008)

LRO: widespread evidence of young lunar volcanism

The feature called Maskelyne is one of many newly discovered young volcanic deposits on the Moon. Called irregular mare patches, these areas are thought to be remnants of small basaltic eruptions that occurred much later than the commonly accepted end of lunar volcanism, 1 to 1.5 billion years ago [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Dwayne Brown

NASA HQ

NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has provided researchers strong evidence the moon’s volcanic activity slowed gradually instead of stopping abruptly a billion years ago.

Scores of distinctive rock deposits observed by LRO are estimated to be less than 100 million years old. This time period corresponds to Earth’s Cretaceous period, the heyday of dinosaurs. Some areas may be less than 50 million years old. Details of the study are published online in Sunday’s edition of Nature Geoscience.

“This finding is the kind of science that is literally going to make geologists rewrite the textbooks about the moon,” said John Keller, LRO project scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.

The deposits are scattered across the moon’s dark volcanic plains and are characterized by a mixture of smooth, rounded, shallow mounds next to patches of rough, blocky terrain. Because of this combination of textures, the researchers refer to these unusual areas as irregular mare patches.

The features are too small to be seen from Earth, averaging less than a third of a mile (500 meters) across in their largest dimension. One of the largest, a well-studied area called Ina, was imaged from lunar orbit by Apollo 15 astronauts.

Ina appeared to be a one-of-a-kind feature until researchers from Arizona State University in Tempe and Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster in Germany spotted many similar regions in high-resolution images taken by the two Narrow Angle Cameras that are part of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera, or LROC. The team identified a total of 70 irregular mare patches on the near side of the moon.

The large number of these features and their wide distribution strongly suggest that late-stage volcanic activity was not an anomaly but an important part of the moon's geologic history.

The numbers and sizes of the craters within these areas indicate the deposits are relatively recent. Based on a technique that links such crater measurements to the ages of Apollo and Luna samples, three of the irregular mare patches are thought to be less than 100 million years old, and perhaps less than 50 million years old in the case of Ina. The steep slopes leading down from the smooth rock layers to the rough terrain are consistent with the young age estimates.

In contrast, the volcanic plains surrounding these distinctive regions are attributed to volcanic activity that started about 3 1/2 billion years ago and ended roughly 1 billion years ago. At that point, all volcanic activity on the moon was thought to cease.

Several earlier studies suggested that Ina was quite young and might have formed due to localized volcanic activity. However, in the absence of other similar features, Ina was not considered an indication of widespread volcanism.

The findings have major implications for how warm the moon’s interior is thought to be.

An oblique, novel view of the Ina formation (3 km across, 18.65°N, 5.3°E) from the LROC narrow angle camera (resolution 2.5 meters per pixel [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

“The existence and age of the irregular mare patches tell us that the lunar mantle had to remain hot enough to provide magma for the small-volume eruptions that created these unusual young features,” said Sarah Braden, a recent Arizona State University graduate and the lead author of the study.

The new information is hard to reconcile with what currently is thought about the temperature of the interior of the moon.

“These young volcanic features are prime targets for future exploration, both robotic and human,” said Mark Robinson, LROC principal investigator at Arizona State University.

LRO is managed by Goddard for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington. LROC, a system of three cameras, was designed and built by Malin Space Science Systems and is operated by Arizona State University.

To access the complete collection of LROC images, visit http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/

For more information about LRO, visit http://www.nasa.gov/lro

Some Related Posts:
Hansteen α -   January 15, 2014
Small-scale volcanism on the lunar mare, July 13, 2013
Unassuming volcanic vent north of Aristarchus Plateau, April 1, 2013
New views of the hollows of Rimae Sosigenes, March 28, 2013
Inside Rima Hyginus, June 12, 2012
Ina of the Meniscus Hollows, March 21, 2012
LUNAR MENISCUS HOLLOWS. P. J. Stooke, Department of Geography and Centre for Planetary Science and Exploration, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; 43rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2012), #1011.
Whale of a Hollow, March 20, 2012
It's a gas, man, Paul Spudis, Smithsonian Air & Space, October 6, 2011

New evidence for young lunar volcanism

One of many newly-discovered young volcanic deposits on the Moon (4.330°N, 33.750°E), this example is near the crater Maskelyne, in south central Mare Tranquillitatis. Illustration from from "New evidence for young lunar volcanism," Mark Robinson, Oct. 12, 2014. LROC NAC observation M1123340138R, LRO orbit 17730, May 16, 2013; slew 3° from orbital nadir, incidence 66.55° resolution 1.04 meters from 102.5 km over 4.26°N, 33.97°E [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Mark Robinson

Principal Investigator

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC)

Arizona State University

Many young volcanic deposits were recently identified in LROC NAC images. Their sharp nature and general lack of superposed impact craters greater than 20 meters in diameter indicate these deposits probably formed in the last 100 million years, perhaps even more recently than 50 million years ago. An amazing result!

A new paper, (Evidence for basaltic volcanism on the Moon within the past 100 million years, Nature Geoscience 7, 787-791; 2014) presents 70 topographic anomalies, informally called Irregular Mare Patches, or IMPs, most of these occurrences were previously undocumented. The IMPs are thought to be remnants of small basaltic eruptions that formed significantly after the commonly accepted end of lunar volcanism (1 to 1.5 billion years ago).

Locations of IMPs. Red circles indicate either a single IMP greater than 100 meters in diameter, or a cluster of smaller IMPs. The area extends from 28.0° N to 40.6° N latitude and 58.0 ° E to 50.3° E longitude, LROC WAC 643nm mosaic. IMP labels: Aristarchus (A), Gruithuisen E-M region (GEM), Hyginus (H), Ina (I), Mare Nubium (MN),  Mare Tranquillitatis (MT), Marius Hills (MH), Maskelyne (M), Sosigenes (S) [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Pursuing a Decades-old Puzzle

The best-known IMP, called Ina (or Ina-D), was originally spotted in Apollo 15 orbital photography, and was unlike anything else previously discovered on the lunar surface. Beginning with Apollo era investigations, Ina was interpreted as a collapsed caldera at the summit of a low-shield volcano. Previous interpretations of impact crater densities within and around Ina suggested that this enigmatic landform was much younger than the surrounding mare basalt unit in Lacus Felicitatis (Lake of Happiness).

Not only does the NAC provide excellent resolution, but after 5 years of operation has covered well over 75% of the surface. This combination led to the discovery of many new IMPs in locations across the nearside of the Moon. Ina is not simply a one-off oddity – but rather a signature of volcanic processes that actually occurred in multiple places across the nearside.

Close up of a small 464 meter wide section of the "IMP" familiarly known as Ina. This area is a great example of the difference between the rough and smooth units that make up the new family of IMP structures. The smooth unit is composed of mounds over the rougher units. The Sun is from the East, the black arrows show a Sun-facing cliff of one of the mounds. LROC NAC M175246029LR, LRO orbit 10960, November 6, 2011; 45.6° incidence, resolution 44 cm from 24.54 km over 18.91°N, 4.76°E [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

New Discoveries

All of the lunar landforms identified as IMPs exhibit two distinct morphologies: smooth deposits, which are sometimes connected to the surrounding mare basalt, and uneven deposits (rough-looking) which usually end abruptly at the steep edges of the smooth deposit; it is likely that the smooth materials are covering portions of the rough material.

To estimate the age of IMPs the LROC team measured the sizes and numbers of impact craters on the smooth deposit surfaces (geologists use the crater size-frequency distribution (CSFD) as a metric for estimating the age of a surface). The resulting crater distributions from the three largest irregular mare patches imply ages younger than 100 million years. Indeed, the new crater counts confirmed that Ina is very young, perhaps as young as 33 million years.

IMP north of Aristarchus crater (25.044°N, 313.233°E). Compelling evidence of the youth of this feature and its apparent origination from active processes within the Moon. As a matter of stratigraphy, the phenomena that caused this occurred after the formation of Aristarchus crater, a late Copernican age crater itself superposed on some of the Moon's youngest basaltic volcanic plains. 650 meter-wide field of view from LROC NAC observation M168509312R, LRO orbit 9967, August 20, 2011; incidence 42.67° at 40 cm resolution from 25.59 km over 24.7°N, 313.21°E [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Another key set of observations came from digital topographic maps derived from NAC stereo pairs that enabled quantitative relief and slope measurements of six larger IMPs. Measurements of the smooth deposit relief compared to the underlying uneven deposit revealed that the thickness of the smooth deposits (on average 8 meters, with a range of 2-20 meters) is consistent with the previously established thickness of lunar basalt flows.

Topographic slopes were measured at the edges of the smooth deposits where they contact the uneven deposits. Slopes that exceed the angle of repose, which is 30-35°, are evidence of relatively young surface features, because over time impacts and moonquakes will smooth over steep cliffs. Slopes on the edges of many of the smooth deposits exceed the angle of repose, providing more evidence for very young surfaces.

Changing the Way We Think About the Moon

Not only are the IMPs striking landscapes, they also tell us something very important about the thermal evolution of the Moon. The nearside has extensive mare basalt flows covering much of its surface, however we know from analysis of Apollo samples and crater counts that the bulk of lunar volcanism occurred from 3.9 to 3.1 billion years ago, and shut-off sometime around 1 billion years ago. However the IMPs seemed to have formed significantly after the canonical cessation of lunar mare basalt volcanism indicating the interior of the Moon is perhaps hotter than previously thought.

The contrast between the smooth and rough units stands out in this oblique view of Ina. The floor of the depression is about 50 m below the surrounding plains and is about 2 km wide. LRO oblique mosaic M1108203502LR, LRO orbit 15596, November 22, 2012; 52.18° slew from orbital nadir, resolution 3.75 meters from 127.29 km over 18.77°N, 11.64°E [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Full-width reduction of LRO oblique mosaic M1108203502LR, showing the interesting contextual features, some related, others likely not, subject of decades of speculation [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

The new study of IMPs extends our knowledge of the extent of these fascinating deposits as well as their young age. What does it all mean? The young, small-volume extrusions of mare basalt imply a thermal history of the Moon where volcanism did not end abruptly, but rather decreased gradually over time (and may not be done!). With these newly discovered young volcanic features, scientists must consider that the Moon has a bit more heat in it that previously thought, an important new constraint for future models of the Moon's thermal evolution. Perhaps the abundance of radioactive elements (which provide heat as they decay) is higher -- important knowledge when figuring out how the Moon formed and evolved over time.

A provocative side note to the new thermal constraints — perhaps the Apollo heat flow measurements were spot on? Astronauts buried thermometers in the regolith during the Apollo 15 and 17 missions. The temperatures recorded were a bit higher than models predicted. At the time, scientists proposed that perhaps the two landing sites were in areas with higher heat flow than the average Moon, or perhaps there was an instrumental effect. The discovery of IMPs and their young age is certainly consistent with the higher temperatures measured by the Apollo crews.

Apollo 15 cmdr. Dave Scott working at the west Heat Flow hole (with St. George crater in the background). The drill is sitting on the ground next to the hole. Increased understanding of IMP phenomena increases the likelihood readings taken using the Apollo Heat Flow Experiments (HFE) during the Apollo 15 and 17 surface expeditions were not, afterall, anomalous. Apollo 15 EVA-2 AS15-92-12408 [NASA/JSC].

The IMPs are a fascinating part of the story of lunar volcanism over time, and now they must be considered high priority targets for future exploration. A sample return mission from one of these enigmatic deposits would tell us so much about the Moon as a whole. When did these lavas erupt? Is their chemistry different than the basalts returned by the Apollo astronauts? Is it likely that volcanic eruptions may occur at some point in the future?  A highly accurate age date for the IMPs would also serve as a much needed calibration point for the lunar cratering chronology; a crucial improvement not only for lunar studies but also for Mars and Mercury investigations.

Closer look at the IMP at Rimae Sosigenes - image follows below - Demonstrations Supplementary to "Evidence for basaltic volcanism on the Moon within the past 100 million years," Nature Geoscience 7, 787-791; 2014

Fig. 7 (top) Profile across a contact between smooth and uneven deposits, southeast feature. The relief of the smooth deposit is measured as the difference in elevation between the average flat surface of the smooth deposit (-1504 meters below global mean elevation; Sosigenes Graben NAC-DTM) and the base of the uneven deposit at the contact (-1514 meters). For this particular profile the smooth deposit is 10 meters thick. Note the lobate margin of the smooth deposit at the contact.

Fig. 5 (bottom) Craters on the smooth deposit of the Sosigenes IMP. The red circles are impact craters superposed on the smooth deposit of the Sosigenes IMP, delineated by the blue line; field of view roughly 5 km [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Spectacular oblique mosaic of the Sosigenes graben with it's large collapse pit, 2800 meters long and 300 meters deep, and floored with an IMP.  LROC NAC oblique observation M1108117962LR, LRO orbit 15584, November 21, 2012; 70.37° incidence, spacecraft and camera slew 55° resolution 2.5 meters from 114.87 km over 8.63°N, 24.9°E [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

View full-window: Spectacular oblique NAC mosaic of the Sosignes graben with a large collapse pit (2800 meters wide, left-to-right; 300 meters deep) floored with an IMP.

Wider field of view from a spectacular oblique LROC NAC mosaic M152750200LR, LRO orbit 15584, November 21, 2012; 70.37° incidence, spacecraft and camera slew 55° resolution 2.5 meters from 114.87 km over 8.63°N, 24.9°E [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Inspect a variety IMPs using the LROC Quickmap: Cauchy-5, Nubium, GEM-30, Aristarchus North

Related Posts:

Diversity of basaltic volcanism and the Marius Hills (November 5, 2013)

New views of the hollows of Rimae Sosigenes (March 28, 2013)

Inside Rima Hyginus (June 12, 2012)

Ina of the Meniscus Hollows (March 21, 2012)

How Young is Young? (Apollo 16) (March 9, 2012)

Spectral properties of Ina (February 7, 2011)

How common are mare pit craters? (July 15, 2010)