Monday, May 17, 2010

Lunar Swirl phenomena from LRO


Ahead of Part 2 of our discussion begun last Tuesday of the Descartes Formation we've stumbled on more than a few images of lunar swirls, not all immediately useful. Among them is a rare semi-processed LROC wide-angle camera views covering a wide swath on the Moon's far side. In Mare Ingenii (33.7°S, 163.5°E) are the most unmistakable swirl phenomena on the Moon. Among the material of "low optical maturity" here on the surface is the "butterfly swirl," nested inside the influence of a local crustal magnetic field. By inference this magnetic anomaly is associated with a basin-forming impact that created Mare Imbrium on the direct opposite side of the Moon, >3.8 billion years ago [LROC WAC M103439292MC-NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].


The heart of Reiner Gamma (7.4°N, 300.9°E), the most conspicuous and studied swirl on the Moon's near side. While in Part 2 of the Descartes discussion our interest is in topographic and some extreme close-up LRO narrow-angle camera views of this otherwise well-photographed phenomenon, the WAC view above, along with others, provide their own distinct, beautiful value. If there was an impact on the direct opposite side, or antipodal, to the magnetism associated with Reiner Gamma it has yet to be clearly identified. Instead this very long swirl and its warp and woof of magnetic field lines in Oceanus Procellarum appears related to the volcanism centered on the Marius Hills. Because Reiner Gamma might be the largest and longest swirl on the Moon's near side, you might think it's local magnetic field is the strongest, also. That's not the case, however. That distinction belongs elsewhere, where a well-mapped landmark was only discovered to be a true albedo swirl only recently (and decades after Apollo 16 visited nearby) [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Moon & Venus from the UK


Late spring clouds and thunder prevented our viewing overnight, though others in North America had an opportunity Saturday to view Moon, Venus, International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Atlantis, ahead of a final rendezvous and docking Sunday. From Tom's Astronomy Blog in the UK, this reduction of a larger and more sublime image of the last moments of astronomical twilight, UT [Astronomy Blog].

"Last night we had some clear skies and I caught a nice glimpse of a slim, crescent Moon with Venus nearby. The Moon moves fairly quickly though so the two appeared much closer several hours ago as seen from Australia. The Moon was even seen to occult Venus from India and Northern Africa this morning."

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Using the Earth to study the Moon

Paul D. Spudis
The Once & Future Moon
Smithsonian Air & Space Blogs


Last week, the Science Team of the Mini-RF imaging radar experiment aboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission, met in Flagstaff, Arizona. We were there to conduct field studies of some interesting lunar analogs that occur in this area. Scientists study the planets through a variety of means, including images, remote-sensing, and sample return. One technique involves studying the processes and deposits of the Earth as a guide or analog to understanding similar features on the Moon and other bodies. Analogs have been studied since the beginning of the space program and have been essential to unraveling the complex histories of rocky objects in the Solar System.

The team gathered early Wednesday morning north of Flagstaff. Our field guides pictured the three areas we would spend the day visiting, along with geologically similar features found on the Moon. Our technique used airborne radar images of our targets: The SP cone and lava flow, Sunset Crater National Monument and Meteor Crater. Each site offers specific features that one can observe and walk across, using it as a guide toward understanding the same processes that have shaped our Moon. Our field trip illuminated the radar data in a “real world” environment, assisting us as we continue to explore and map with our instrument now orbiting the Moon.

The SP cone and flow is one of the most remarkable volcanic features in the region, with a beautifully symmetrical cinder cone and an extremely rough, blocky lava flow (Fig. 1; for full resolution versions of the surface pictures, click here: a, b, c). As viewed from the ground, the lava flow is blocky and extremely rough at the scale of the L-band radar wavelength (about 25 cm, or almost a foot). Steep flow fronts of blocky lava lie directly upon a smooth plateau of flat-lying sedimentary rocks. These remarkable flow fronts can be up to 50 m high (over 150 feet) and their rubbly, rugged fronts provide a spectacular contrast to the featureless plain upon which they rest. In the radar image, the lava flow is extremely bright, indicating high radar returns and its circular polarization ratio (CPR), one measure of its surface roughness at wavelength scales, is very high.


SP cone and flow, a very rough, fresh volcanic feature in northern Arizona. Radar image courtesy of L. Carter, Smithsonian Inst. (click to enlarge.)

The relations seen at the SP flow indicate the very high CPR features on the Moon could likewise represent very rough, block-rich surfaces. An example of such is the unusual flow of shock impact melt (not volcanic lava, although quite similar in terms of its physical properties) seen emanating from the far side crater Gerasimovich D (22°S, 122°W, 26 km diameter; Fig. 2). Both of these lobate flows (volcanic lava on the Earth, impact melt on the Moon) show high CPR, indicating the surface of the flow on the Moon probably has similar properties to the SP flow north of Flagstaff. One exception is that the mean block size on the Moon may be smaller, as the Mini-RF S-band radar has a shorter wavelength (12.6 cm or about 5 inches) than the longer wavelength AIRSAR L-band image (23 cm wavelength) of SP crater.


Gerasimovich D, directly on the opposite side of the Moon from Mare Crisium, is pictured showing an outflow of impact melt rock with high CPR, similar to the high CPR seen in the SP lava flow. This "Crisium Antipodes" is also site of the most intense crustal magnetism yet discovered on the Moon, sufficient to cavitate Solar Wind and to form a "mini-magnetosphere" over the area. (click to enlarge)

Fifteen miles away from the SP flow, an instructive set of geologic relations are seen at Sunset Crater National Monument (Fig. 3; for full resolution versions of the surface pictures, click here: d, e). At this feature, the extremely rough lava surface of the Bonito flow is in direct contact with smooth, ash mantled hills of the same age. This contact is shown by the sharp boundary between high CPR lava and the extremely low CPR ash-covered hills in the radar image. Such a relation is also evident on the Moon, where regional dark mantle deposits of lunar volcanic ash (such as the Sulpicius Gallus dark mantle on the rim of Mare Serenitatis) show low CPR, exactly as does its terrestrial counterpart. Once again, the Earth example allows us to better interpret our remote-sensing data for the Moon.


Sunset crater lava flow (high CPR) and ash deposits (low CPR). Radar image courtesy of L. Carter, Smithsonian Inst. (click to enlarge)

The Moon is covered with millions of impact craters and we were anxious to visit and compare the radar data of Meteor crater, the world’s first proven impact structure, with surface conditions within and near the crater rim to better understand the surface of the Moon. The rugged, blocky ejecta of rocks thrown out of the crater is evident by the radar bright halo surrounding Meteor crater (Fig. 4; for full resolution versions of the surface pictures, click here: g,h,i,j). On the ground, this is manifested by abundant boulders of rock, strewn about the outer rim of the crater. The crater interior is filled with ancient lake bed sediments. This fine-grained material results in lower radar echoes for the floor of Meteor crater than for its rocky walls and rim. Similar features are found in certain lunar craters where fine-grained material, moved downhill by gravity, partly fills the crater interiors. The afternoon’s hike down into and across the floor of Meteor crater gave all of us a better appreciation for the surface topography and conditions on the Moon. The climb back up to the rim, capped off our long day of field work.


Meteor Crater in Arizona, showing blocky, rough exterior rim deposits, wall outcrop, and fine-grained floor materials. AIRSAR radar image (click to enlarge)

Many of the geological features seen in radar images of the Earth are also seen in the radar images from the Moon. As we continue to map the Moon with the Mini-RF radar, the sometimes puzzling relations seen in the lunar data are understood better by comparison with Earth analogs. Our entire team acquired valuable insight into how the Moon works and what the surface is like from our day in the field. For a geologist, there is simply no substitute for directly observed field data to fully comprehend the complex history and processes of the Moon.

Equally interesting and important will be the insight and knowledge gained when we sample the Moon in more detail. The Moon has been described as a “dead planet” because compared to the Earth, which has rapid, dynamic processes of erosion, the Moon remains unchanged for millions of years. However, for its ability to retain the ancient historical record of the Earth-Moon system, advantage goes to the Moon. The multi-billion year records of impact and solar wind embedded in the lunar surface awaits our recovery, and will tell us about both the past and possible future of our home planet.

Apollo Astronauts: Future of Human Space Flight


United States Senate
Committee Commerce, Science and Transportation

Dr. Neil Armstrong, Captain Eugene Cernan & Hon. Norm Augustine
May 12, 2010

CSPAN.ORG Video Library - Witnesses talked about the future of human space flight in relation to President Obama's recent announcement of a new direction for NASA. Former Apollo astronauts criticized the plan as a "blueprint for a mission to nowhere" because it lacked a specific vision and proper review of the long-term NASA mission.

Friday, May 14, 2010

Regolith patterns in Mendel-Rydberg ROI


Regolith patterns in the Mendel-Rydberg Constellation Region of Interest (51.14°S, 266.93°E), from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Narrow-Angle Camera (LROC NAC) M118090761LE; field width = 0.64 km [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Peter Thomas
LROC News System

Regolith detail in the Constellation region of interest Mendel-Rydberg. Much of this region of interest is located in a terrain known as a "cryptomare." Cryptomaria are mare basalt volcanic deposits obscured by superposed materials usually of higher albedo. The obscuring materials are typically the ejecta of later-forming craters and basins, which blanket the older mare basalt. In the case of Mendel-Rydberg, much of the material covering the older mare may have been ejecta from the Orientale basin-forming impact event, which occurred hundreds of kilometers to the north.

The covering by ejecta of varying compositions, thicknesses, and albedos complicates the task of making an inventory of the amounts, composition, and history of lunar volcanism, and thus cryptomaria are of high scientific interest (see also the Balmer Basin region).


LRO (LROC) Wide-Angle Camera monochrome context image showing the Mendel-Rydberg Constellation Region of Interest and approximate location (arrow) of the Narrow-Angle Camera detail above. The smooth region to the west (left) of the arrow is the Mendel-Rydberg cryptomare. LROC WAC M118104209ME, click here for the full scene, 118 km across [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

The full-resolution NAC view above illustrates the complexity of the highlands surface in the eastern portion of the Constellation region of interest. Here the cover of fragmentary material, or "regolith," displays the so-called "elephant skin" texture (also seen here and here) which is probably the result of slow movement involving thermal cycles of the lunar day-night and seismic shaking from meteorite impacts. The high resolution LROC images and accurate topographic information will help sort out the causes of this long-known surface characteristic of parts of the lunar surface.

Browse the full-resolution NAC image here.

LOLA: Einstein & Einstein A

A Study in Crater Morphology. Einstein (16.6°N, 271.5°E) and nestled within Einstein A. Laser Altimetry from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) instrument on-board the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter [NASA/GSFC].

LOLA-GSFC Image of the Week - May 14, 2010: Located on the far western limb of the Moon, Einstein and Einstein A (16.6°N, 271.5°E ) are only visible to Earth-bound observers during the rare favorable libration.

Einstein A is younger than Einstein, as indicated by the fact that it lies squarely in the middle of the Einstein's floor. Viewed an topographic data, these two craters reveal much about the relative age and shape of an impact crater.

To understand further, let's first take a look at Einstein. Einstein is a fairly large crater that spans 198 kilometers across. A crater's size alone however cannot reveal much about age. Einstein's relative age can be determined by examining the frequency and distribution of impact craters overprinted on its rim and floor. Younger craters have fewer such impact counts, so they retain more original morphology.

As you may have already guessed, Einstein cluster craters are named after physicist, philosopher and scientist Albert Einstein (1879-1955).

+ Go to LOLA "Image of the Week" Collection.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

LROC: "In an Instant!"


Detail showing a respectably large boulder, from LROC Featured Image, Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) M125733619, May 12, 2009. Inside an unnamed 5 km Copernican-aged crater on the lunar farside (8.0°N, 182.96°E) [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Boulders and impact melt on the interior wall of a recent 5 km (3 mile) diameter crater. The rim of the crater is near the top of the image, downhill is towards the bottom of the image [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Dr. Mark Robinson
Principal Investigator
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC)
Arizona State University

LROC News System - Outside of the protective veil of the Earth's atmosphere, the Solar System is a dynamic, constantly changing environment. Nowhere is this more true than on the lunar surface. Asteroids and comets slam into the Moon at speeds greater than 16 km (10 miles) creating impact craters in a matter of seconds. So much energy is released in these impacts that the impactor is mostly vaporized and some of the target rock is melted. Rocks and soil are thrown out and form spectacular ejecta aprons.

Rocks excavated from the deepest part of the crater typically land very near the rim, and material from the original surface is thrown out towards the edge of the ejecta blanket. Astronauts can easily sample the full range of depth of the crater without having to go down the steep slopes - they can simply collect samples as they approach the rim. Nature has provided a convenient look into the subsurface!


Bright and dark patterns show the distribution of ejecta of a 5 km diameter crater (8.0°N, 182.2°E), portion of LROC images M125733619L, R subsampled to 5 m/pixel [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

The full resolution sub-image (top) focuses on the northeast wall (upper right) of the spectacular crater seen above. The low reflectance material is most likely impact melt that was thrown out during the impact. The streamers of impact melt (black materials) help scientists trace the path of ejecta taken during the cratering process. The floor of the crater is flat and dark: it is the remnant of impact melt that pooled in the bottom of the crater. The fact that these features are so well preserved is evidence that the crater formed recently in geologic terms. But how recent is recent? Over time smaller impacts will degrade these exquisite details and slowly this crater will fade into the background. Without samples, the only way we have of estimating ages of young craters is by counting the number of even smaller craters that have formed on their surfaces.

The best way to date impact craters is to sample their impact melt - as the molten rock cooled and formed new minerals their radiometric clock was reset. Scientists can measure the ratio of parent atoms to their daughter products and very accurately determine the age of crystallization. Planetary scientists would very much like to obtain accurate age dates for many of these young craters to determine the rate of recent impacts on the Moon. Current impact rates determined for the Moon are applicable to the Earth!

Sometimes it's easy to lose a sense of scale when looking at high resolution images of the Moon - the diameter of this crater (5 km) is about the same as the distance from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial to the U.S. Capitol. The solidified lake of impact melt in the bottom of the crater is 1200 meters (3937 ft) across! Meteor Crater (near Winslow, Arizona) is about the same size as this floor deposit.


Aerial view of Meteor Crater, Arizona (Smithsonian, 1928) [NASA/Near Earth Object Program/Images of Meteor Crater].

Studies of young impact craters by future astronaut explorers will provide key insights into a host of scientific questions, most especially about the timing of recent impacts in the Solar System and the nature of the cratering process here on Earth.

Explore this fascinating crater on your own.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Central Peak of Bullialdus


Summit of the central peak of Bullialdus (20.7°S, 337.8°E), a Tier One Constellation Region of Interest on the Moon. LROC Narrow Angle Camera image M114098458LE, Resolution = 48 centimeters per pixel [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Samuel Lawrence
LROC News System

Nearly every square inch of the Moon is affected by impact craters, from micron-sized pits to gargantuan impact basins (like the 1100 km diameter Imbrium basin, which you can see with your naked eyes on a clear night).

Lunar craters have a dizzying array of sizes and morphologies; this is because the size and the morphology of a crater depends on the size (and to some extent, the speed) of the impacting bolide. While there are no places on the lunar surface that aren't interesting or worthy of a visit from human explorers, a recurring theme that you'll see on the list of Constellation program Regions of Interest are complex craters - large craters with a central peak.


LROC Wide Angle Camera View of 60 km-wide Bullialdus. The approximate position of today's LROC Narrow-Angle Camera Featured Image is highlighted with the white arrow [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Sending astronauts to visit complex craters is fundamental to our understanding the Moon. The reason is simple: the Moon is the best preserved and most accessible laboratory for understanding impact processes. Impacts are the most fundamental and important geologic process in the Solar System. On the Earth, which has been hit by impactors for over four billion years, erosion caused by wind and precipitation degrades impact craters, making them (relatively) hard to study. On the Moon, though, these craters are relatively well preserved.

Complex craters are of particular interest. Complex craters have a well defined central peak and often a terraced rim; this central peak is brought up from great depths beneath the crater as the ground elastically rebounds after the shock and pressure of the bolide impact. These sorts of impacts happened on Earth, too - but the erosion caused by terrestrial weather removes all traces of their presence. On the Moon, though, complex impact structures are well-preserved, and the central peaks - which have brought up materials from great depth - offer us the easiest way to explore the composition of the Moon's lower crust and upper mantle, providing critical insights for planetary scientists trying to figure out how planets in this Solar System (and others, around other stars) form.

Today's featured image shows the summit of the central peak of Bullialdus crater, a Constellation program region of interest located in the western part of Mare Nubium. Spectroscopic observations of Bullialdus using terrestrial telescopes showed that Bullialdus is compositionally distinct from the surrounding region. Later studies using Clementine multi-spectral data indicated that there are several rock types exposed on the floor of the crater. Lunar scientists who have studied Bullialdus proposed that the impact excavated mafic materials from great depth.

Lunar scientists need to discover what these mafic materials are - are they some type of exotic mare basalts? Rare highlands non-mare volcanic rocks? We don't know, and we must find out to fully understand the Moon.

The central peak of Bullialdus is about a kilometer high. Astronaut explorers will not only have to explore around the base, but probably also scale this small mountain to collect the diverse array of samples required to really answer this question.

Plan your own adventure in Bullialdus crater.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

The still-mysterious Descartes formation


Though its distinctive patch of bright albedo is not apparent at this scale or wavelength, this is the heart of the intriguing Descartes Formation (10.6°S, 16.3°E) from an altitude of 46.71 km as resolved by the Wide-Angle Camera (LROC WAC) on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter during its 2,259th orbit, December 23. North is up and the Sun is less than 10 degrees above the east-northeastern horizon at right, not much different than conditions as they were when Apollo 16 landed only 54 km to the northwest in 1972. The 4 km crater at bottom center is Descartes C, conspicuous on the battered rim of far more ancient 34 km-wide Descartes, mostly beyond view at below left. And directly to the west of Descartes C is the apparent center of a locally intense crustal magnetism, the most intense yet identified on the Moon's near side. [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Life on Earth thrives within a generous magnetic shield, most likely induced by uneven rotation of molten conductive material deep within our planet. Earth is mostly hot viscous liquid while planetary scientists are increasingly confident the Moon is solid down to the bone, though its density is far from uniform. The Moon has little or no global magnetic field, though like poor stitching pulled loose in loops from its fabric, here and there the Moon does feature quite a few widely-placed magnetic anomalies.

The Most conspicuous of these are on the Far Side below the equator, directly on the opposite (or "antipodal") side of the Moon from the Near Side's more familiar impact basins. At the antipodes of Mare Imbrium for example, there are notable magnetic fields within Mare Ingenii (33.7°S, 163.5°E) tenuously joined with field lines in Van de Graaff nearby. This area also corresponds with bright surface albedo patches of a characteristic pattern, some of the Moon's more elegant "swirls."


Not the best picture we've featured of the Ingenii swirl field, but it illustrates a point in comparing two similar representations of different data gathered over Mare Ingenii (33.7°S, 163.5°E). In a far side whole-hemisphere optical mosaic (A.) from Clementine (1994) these swirls, antipodal to Mare Imbrium, contrast nicely with a darker, more "optically mature" background, bringing detail forward. In an admittedly broad-resolution laser altimetry map from the same mission (B.) the phenomena are not detected. Even though more recent laser altimetry indicates there may, in fact, be a very shallow topographic component to the swirls here it's little more than a few meters high and very spread out. [NASA/DOD/USGS].

Most of swirls on the Moon consist of a darker band dividing two brighter lanes that are essentially mirror images of one another, collections of surface material considered "optically immature." That is to say these brighter halves seem to have impossibly resisted a relentless solar wind, and every other kind of space weathering, long after they should have darkened, or more properly "reddened," with or without a magnetic field shielding the area from sunburn. Truly fresh lunar surface material has a maximum "immaturity" of 900 million years.

Additionally the immediate lunar surface at the boot print and tire tread scale is periodically "gardened" by micrometeor bombardment every 2 million years or so.


Figure 2 from "Correlation of a strong lunar magnetic anomaly with a high-albedo region of the Descartes mountains," by Richmond, Hood & Halekas, et.al. (GFL, V. 30, # 7, 2003) "Contour map of the two-dimensionally filtered magnetic field magnitude (in nano-Teslas, or nT) at an altitude of (18.6) km in the vicinity of the Apollo 16 landing site (boxed cross). The photograph is a portion of Apollo 16 mapping camera frame 0161 (AS16-M-0161). Several exposures of the Cayley formation (CF) and the adjacent Descartes mountains (DM) are indicated" [Lunar Prospector Magnetometer data, 1999].

The event (or events) that formed Mare Imbrium, the largest feature easily identified with the naked eye from Earth, is dated at ~3.8 billion years. How then do apparently "shock-fossilized" magnetic fields at the antipodes of a basin-forming impact last? Were they originally much stronger?

If these locally intense magnetic fields protect some surfaces within their small realms from darkening how does this phenomena persist more than a billion years, let alone four times that span?

An emerging theory suggests a more dynamic process, perhaps one that brings the Moon's dynamic, dusty exosphere into the mix, the daily levitating of ionized sub-micron-sized lunar dust out from and away from within the small magnetic influences in these areas while conversely repelling a net amount of fallout from this same source after the polarity of these small particles has flipped.

Whether lunar swirls are a bi-product of the lunar exosphere combined with an interaction with fossilized crustal magnetism is the answer, or if, as some have suggested, these patterns are cometary in origin, and even if these fields possess capabilities that defy solar reddening over a longer period than we yet comprehend, they are definitely starkly beautiful. No two are exactly alike.

As with so much else we are still learning about the Moon, there's also some interesting differences between swirls on the near side and those on the far side.

The strongest of the Moon's magnetic anomalies presently known is Crises Antipodes (CA) near Gerasimovich (22.9°S, 237.4°E) opposite from Mare Crisium. There are swirl markings there also, though these are harder to immediately pick out from the bright highland anorthosite.

First observed by Jasper Halekas and his colleagues at the Space Science Laboratory, recently confirmed with magnetometers on India's Chandraayan-1, there is a true "mini-magnetosphere" over Gerasimovich shown intense enough to cavitate the solar wind just as Earth's magnetosphere plows the solar wind like a rock in a fast-moving stream.

The most famous and studied of the Moon's swirls is Reiner Gamma, a lengthy and meandering bifurcated albedo patch a few degrees above the equator and two-thirds of the way from the Near Side's central meridian to the western limb, in Oceanus Procellarum. As yet, there is no mapped or buried impact on the opposite side of the Moon identified with Reiner Gamma. It may be the extensive magnetic field there is related to a buried metallic flow as evidenced by its origin within the Marius Hills.

Add to the atypical nature of Near Side swirls the amorphous patch of bright coloring overlaying the Descartes mountains. The strongest Near Side swirl is a very undramatic, indistinctive splash of brightness in an area barely 60 km by 40km.

In Part 2, "Crossroads of two impacts" or "Serendipity and Apollo 16"


The splash of relatively bright material over the low hummocky hills of the Descartes formation is easy to spot with a modest telescope, when the sun is high over the area, before and after a Full Moon. At sunrise, the relief of long shadows brings the very unusual cross-hatching of the low, bubble-like ridges becomes apparent. In orbit, the Apollo 16 mapping camera was able to captured both features, even as its landing party explored the area between North and South Ray craters, just off the northern tip of the formation at upper left. Though Apollo 16 detected the strongest indication of a magnetic field at any of the six manned landing sites, and a concentration of iron and titanium oxides corresponding to the albedo patch were imaged by the Clementine orbiter (1994), the "lunar magnetic anomaly" in the region was not mapped until Lunar Prospector orbited very low over the area near the end of it's mission in 1999 [NASA/AS16-M-0161].

Saturday, May 8, 2010

LOLA's Van de Graaff Basin


The Van de Graaff basin is a difficult feature to trace with the eye (see below). Being at the heart of the general area, along with Mare Ingenni, that is on the direct opposite side of the Moon, "antipodal" to Mare Imbrium, it seems no coincidence this wider area of the far side's southern hemisphere is therefore home to a complex "lunar magnetic anomaly." Also, as seems to be the case with all lunar magnetic anomalies, the area is rich with surficial "swirl" phenomena. And it is these bright features that fool the eye, though LOLA shows that their brightness is invisible to laser altimetry. These features are apparently little more than skin deep. They appear to defy a general rule that says space weathering should obscure and darken (more properly "redden") most fresh bright surface materials after 900 million years or so [NASA/GSFC].

LOLA Image of the Week Van de Graaff Crater, on the lunar far side north of South Pole-Aitken (SPA) Basin (26.92°S, 172.08°E), has an unusual figure 8 shape (~240 km x 140 km) that has long caught the eye of lunar scientists. Its shape suggests that it was formed by two separate impacts even though there is no crater wall separating its two halves. LOLA data indicate that the floor of the crater is relatively flat except for the presence of several smaller impact craters. Portions of its rim reach almost 1000 m above lunar mean elevation level, while its floor is near 2100 meters below.

Van de Graaff is a Constellation program Region of Interest, a candidate for robotic and human exploration because of its location within a magnetic and geochemically anomalous region. The Moon does not have a global magnetic field like Earth, and thus the origin of its local crustal magnetic field is of scientific interest.

Van de Graaff and the surrounding region are also slightly enriched in thorium, an element found in lunar KREEP (potassium (K), rare earth elements (REE), and phosphorus (P)) terrain. Most of the Moon's KREEP-rich materials are found on the lunar near side, thus the presence of enhanced thorium in the Van de Graaff area is intriguing.


Looking west southwest from a vantage a few kilometers east of the NASA/Constellation Region of Interest (26.9°S, 172.08°E) within Van de Graaff. LROC Narrow-Angle Camera strip M112822306L (centered on 26.87°S, 172.54°E) is runs north-south through the scene, including a part of Van de Graaff C. [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University]. Along with it's swirls and magnetic anomalies, the region is also one of extremes in elevation.The bottom of Van de Graaff C (lower right), for example, is almost 7 km below the mean global average. Astronauts landed at the Van de Graaff Constellation ROI landing zone, only 20 kilometers southwest, will be standing on a vast rolling plain roughly 4 kilometers below the global average. Rising over the western horizon the crew will easily see the highest peaks on the northwest rim of Van de Graaff, the highest here topping out at over 2 kilometers over the global mean average elevation, for an over all 8 kilometer range in elevations.

A far better comparison of Van de Graaff is available here, in visible light and false-color laser altimetry.

Friday, May 7, 2010

LROC: Mare Frigoris Constellation ROI


The floor of an unnamed 1.2-km-diameter crater in the Mare Frigoris Constellation Region of Interest. Samples of material in and around this 'excavation' could help us understand the complex geologic history of this part of the Moon. See the full-sized LROC Featured Image HERE. (LROC NAC M126752534RE; scene width is ~500 meters [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Brett Denevi
LROC News System

Samples from small, relatively fresh craters like the one above may someday help us learn more about Mare Frigoris and its place in lunar geologic history. Mare Frigoris is located on the lunar nearside, to the north of the Imbrium and Serenitatis basins. Instead of being low in reflectance like typical mare basalts, its reflectance is intermediate between the mare to the south and highlands terrain to the north. This is likely due to a lower iron and titanium content than any of the sampled mare basalts, making it an intriguing end-member in the spectrum of lunar mare volcanism.


Zooming out to an approximate field width of 7 km, the subject crater appears quite typical on the main population line of lunar crater morphology, just large enough to have a flat floor. The proof is in the elemental analysis, however. The low titanium signature contrasts with the landing site of Apollo 11, for example, where titanium oxide is common.

Portions of Mare Frigoris, like the area near the Constellation region of interest outlined below, are so high in reflectance they're considered "light plains." Light plains can form in several different ways: through volcanism, with a composition even lower in iron and titanium; as the result of impact basin ejecta, which acts as a fluid, filling in topographic lows; or as ancient volcanic plains that were subsequently covered with a thin layer of highlands material ejected from nearby craters or basins which masks the true basaltic surface (a hidden, or "cryptomare").


For more information on LROC's observation campaign for the Constellation program regions of interest read this Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstract, and visit the LRO Science Targeting Meeting website (look for summary sheets for each of the fifty Constellation Regions of Interest, Tier 1, Tier 2).

Small craters like the one in the LROC Featured Image up above are excavations where material from below the surface has been brought up to the rim. Sampling can help discern whether or not the material there is distinct in composition (as would be expected for cryptomare). Sampling this material would also provide a definitive resolution to the geologic history of this fascinating region.


A WAC image showing the 40x40 km box centered on the Frigoris region of interest. Arrow indicates the location of the NAC image above. Image number M119673851ME [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Explore the full-resolution LROC Narrow-Angle Camera (NAC) image HERE, the full-sized Featured Image Wide-Angle Camera (WAC) contextual Image HERE, and the full-sized close-up LROC Featured Image HERE.

New releases from Lunar Orbiter II (1966)


Scouting out a candidate future landing site near where the central meridian crosses the equator, the very center of the Moon's near side, Lunar Orbiter II photographs a single medium-resolution image and three high-resolution frames within that field's center, November 22, 1966 [LP/LOIRP].


On first glance this high-definition photograph by Lunar Orbiter II (LOII-111-H2, Sinus Medii, near Pallas V, November 22, 1966) appears to be among the best of that program. However the completely reformatted "restoration" by the Lunar Orbiter Image Restoration Project (LOIRP) below, digitized from original recorded telemetry more closely represents the actual landscape, particularly those clues from which crater depth and surface elemental composition are revealed. These images from Lunar Orbiter II are particularly valuable because these were imaged, using the ingenious clockwork mechanism of the Orbiters powerful camera, from an altitude of only 41.46 kilometers [NASA/JPL/USGS/LPI/LOIRP].



These latest, newly released LOIRP restorations, important for a variety of reasons, including tracing the rate of cratering over the the past 43 years, are available at LOIRP's website Moonviews.com. Frames 2111 and 2112 were made available Monday and Wednesday. The original photographic plates are available online from the USGS-Astrogeology Section and the Lunar and Planetary Institute.

Past discussion here of the interesting story and important success of LOIRP can be reviewed by scrolling down through the link here.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Orion Pad Abort 1 Launch at White Sands


Pad Abort 1 (PA-1), launched May 6, 2010 from White Sands Missile Range, N.M. PA-1 is the first fully integrated flight test of the launch abort system being developed for the Orion crew exploration vehicle [NASA].

Details via NASA.

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

LROC: New views of the Copernicus Interior


Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LROC) Narrow-Angle Camera close-up of light-toned bedrock exposed within the central structural uplift of 93 kilometer-wide Copernicus. The full LROC NAC image strip M102293451 represents a field 1.26 km in width and the outcrop is ~800 meters wide (See Wide Angle Camera context image below and zoom-in on the high-resolution strip HERE). LROC NAC M102293451L was swept up very early in the commissioning phase of the LRO mission, during orbit 251, July 15, 2009, and from an altitude of 120 km [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Livio Leonardo Tornabene
LROC News System

Although large boulders are not rare on the Moon, in-place bedrock is a rarity. The Moon is so impact-battered that most bedrock surfaces (unless exposed on very high slopes) are covered with regolith, and thus bedrock rarely crops out. Bedrock exposures are scientifically important.

Any given point on the lunar surface has been subjected to hundreds of millions of years of meteorite impacts; these impacts tend to redistribute rocks around the lunar surface. Rocks that you just pick up from the lunar surface therefore may not have originated from the point where you found it. Now, you might think from this fact that just sampling loose rocks might not be geologically informative, but loose rocks must have been transported or disrupted by a geologic or planetary process. These processes will overprint or alter a loose rock in some way, which will also provide incredibly useful information to the geoscientist. However, bedrock formed in the location in which it is found and therefore informs scientists about the local history. Craters are one of the places on the Moon that expose bedrock, often on the very high slopes.


Copernicus, perhaps as never-before seen, showing a balance of features usually visible only in the relief of long shadows and other features obscured by their bright and complex albedo features when the sun is almost overhead, around a Full Moon as seen from Earth, courtesy of Arizona State's LROC team and the Wide-Angle Camera (WAC) on-board the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. The arrow highlights the approximate location of the LROC Featured Image above. (LROC WAC image M119985095ME; 75 m/pixel; image width ~90 km) [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Today's LROC NAC image (M102293451) is a close up of the 93-km (58 miles) diameter Copernicus crater showing light-toned fractured bedrock exposed on the higher slopes on the central structural uplift. The bedrock observed in this NAC frame appears to be somewhat intact, and not a breccia (i.e., a rock consisting of a jumble of randomly oriented rock fragments).

It is only slightly brecciated (or fragmented), which is consistent with the manner in which crater central peak rocks are uplifted and exposed. This location gives us a glimpse of bedrock that was protected beneath the surface until exposed by the Copernicus impact event and later landslides. Dark materials appear to fill fractures in this outcrop that may be highly shocked materials (e.g., impact melt or breccias) that were injected into the rock during the formation of Copernicus.


For the Lunar Picture of the Day, May 2, archivist and historian/scientist Charles Wood juxtaposed a full-sized version of the image immediately above by Stefan Lemmel with the LRO laser altimeter (LOLA) topography image released by Goddard Space Flight Center last Friday. Though none were used, to show how familiar and well-studied Copernicus is to Earth-bound photographers, we had several demonstration artwork prepared to accompany the LOLA Image of the Week this past weekend. With the release of the LROC close-ups of the Copernicus interior, it's hard to improve on Wood's choice of Lemmel's image from April 23 [LPOD/Stefan Lemmel].

Spectral data from previous lunar orbital spacecraft suggested that the bulk of these light-toned rocks are consistent with troctolite (different from basalt and anorthosite that commonly occur on the lunar surface).

A troctolite is a relatively uncommon igneous rock on Earth. Troctolites consist of almost equal parts of the minerals olivine and Ca-rich plagioclase and are found in some of the most ancient large subsurface igneous bodies on Earth. Such igneous bodies are thought to have formed so slowly over time that the crystals separated from the cooling liquid magma (somewhat like oil and water separating) and accumulated (either sinking to the bottom or floating to the surface) in the magma body. These magma bodies may be quite abundant beneath the lunar crust as suggested by spectral studies of crater central peaks and cosmochemical investigations of Apollo lunar samples (especially the regolith samples) as well as lunar meteorites.

Because bedrock outcrops on the central peaks of large impact craters can bring these deep subsurface materials to the surface, large crater central peaks (like Copernicus) are high-priority scientific targets for future human and robotic exploration. Future astronaut explorers inside Copernicus will be exploring one of the most beautiful and dramatic places in the Solar System - and making tremendous scientific advances in the process!

Plan your own visit to the central peak of Copernicus.

For more information on LROC's observation campaign for the Constellation program regions of interest read this Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstract, and visit the LRO Science Targeting Meeting website (look for the baseball card summary sheets for each site: part 1, part 2).


Anaglyph of the Featured Image, showing one of the central peaks of Copernicus. Viewing requires anaglyph "3D glasses," with a red lens on the left and blue on the right) [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Monday, May 3, 2010

The Four Flavors of Lunar Water

From Lunar Pioneer
Earth over the watery north polar regions of the Moon, as viewed from NASA/DOD platform Clementine (1994) [USGS].

Paul D. Spudis
The Once and Future Moon
Smithsonian Air & Space Blogs


The Moon is constantly bombarded by the solid debris of the Solar System. Comets, asteroids and interplanetary dust, all containing varying amounts of water, have pounded the lunar surface for billions of years. Yet until recently, the Moon was considered to be barren and bone-dry. Rock and soil samples returned by the Apollo missions lacked any hydrous mineral phases or water-bearing weathering products. Since water is not stable on the Moon under ordinary conditions, what happens to it?

New studies of lunar samples, along with results from several missions in recent years, have given us a revolutionary new picture of water on the Moon. Study of volcanic glass from the Apollo 15 landing site in 2008 demonstrated that tiny amounts of water (about 50 parts per million) are present in the interiors of these glasses, suggesting that the lunar mantle (whence they came) contains about ten times this amount. This was a startling result, considering the extreme dryness of other lunar samples.

Because the Moon’s spin axis is nearly perpendicular (1.5° from vertical) to the ecliptic plane, the Sun is always on the horizon at the poles, keeping the floors of deep craters in permanent shadow. These dark areas only receive heat from the interior of the Moon and are extremely cold; recent measurements by the DIVINER instrument on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) spacecraft indicate temperatures as cold as 25-35° C above absolute zero. Water molecules are trapped by the cold as soon as they find their way into these craters. Over the more than 4.5 billion years of lunar history, significant amounts of water could accumulate in many of these crater “cold traps” at the Moon’s poles.

"The Moon is on the critical path to human expansion into the Solar System."
The first hint of water ice in these polar cold traps came from a radio experiment aboard the 1994 Clementine mapping mission orbiting the Moon. The polarization characteristics of echoes from the south pole were consistent with the presence of ice in the crater Shackleton. Four years later, the Lunar Prospector (LP) spacecraft carried an instrument designed to measure the amount and energy of neutrons given off the Moon’s surface. Hydrogen absorbs neutrons, so when LP investigators saw a decrease in the flux of medium-energy neutrons near the lunar poles, they concluded that excess amounts of hydrogen were present there. Although this observation is consistent with the presence of polar ice, neutron data alone do not tell us what form the hydrogen is in, and it was alternatively postulated that this enhancement was caused by excess solar wind hydrogen.

The Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3) instrument on the 2008-09 Indian Chandrayaan-1 mission collected reflectance spectra for most of the Moon. It found both water (H2O) and hydroxyl (OH) molecules, present either as a monolayer on lunar dust grains or bound into the mineral structures in surface materials, poleward of about 65° latitude at both poles. Moreover, the abundance of this surface water varies with time, being present in greater quantity in both local early morning and late evening and it increases in abundance with increasing latitude. These results were verified by observations from the Cassini and EPOXI spacecraft during separate flybys of the Moon. The new observations indicate significant quantities of water moving towards areas with lower mean surface temperatures and increasing in abundance with latitude. Taken all together, the results mean that water is being deposited (e.g., by comet impact) and/or created (e.g., by reduction of metal oxides in the surface by solar wind protons) and then transported to the poles. By this process, significant quantities of water ice could accumulate at the poles over geological time.

Last October, the companion satellite to LRO, LCROSS, slammed the upper stage of its launch vehicle into the Moon’s south pole and observed the ejected material. Results show that both water vapor and ice particles were ejected from the LCROSS impact crater; initial analyses indicate that water is present at about the 5-10 wt.% level. The LCROSS impact site exhibits no anomalous radar behavior, suggesting that such an amount of water ice cannot be detected by radar. However, the results do indicate that significant amounts of lunar polar water may be present even in the absence of specific radar evidence for it. Spectra from this impact event show evidence for other volatile substances, including ammonia and simple carbon compounds. The presence of such material may indicate a cometary source for these volatile materials.

Both poles were covered by radar images from the Mini-SAR instrument on Chandrayaan-1. Much of the north polar region displays backscattering properties typical for the ordinary Moon, but one group of craters in the region show elevated polarization enhancements in their interiors, but not in deposits exterior to their rims. Almost all of these anomalous craters are in permanent sun shadow and correlate with proposed locations of ice modeled on the basis of the Lunar Prospector neutron data. These relations suggest that the interiors of these craters contain nearly pure water ice, with approximately 600 million metric tonnes of ice present in over 40 small craters within 10 degrees of the pole. The south polar region shows similar relations, except that it has fewer anomalous craters than the north pole. Small areas of polarization enhancement are found in some craters, notably Shoemaker, Haworth and Faustini; these areas might be deposits of water ice.

So water on the Moon is present in large quantity in at least four different “flavors.” Water was in the deep lunar interior 3.3 billion years ago, at concentration levels of a few hundred parts per million. This water would have been released during the eruption of lunar magma and could have made its way into the polar cold traps. Water is either being made or being deposited nearly continuously by impact all over the Moon. Most of this water is subsequently lost to space (e.g., by sputtering, ionization or thermal escape) but some is retained on the Moon. Any water arriving at a cold trap near the pole will be captured. Water, once in the polar areas, is stable as ice in the permanent darkness or where sublimation is prevented when buried by a thin layer of soil. Significant quantities of water may accumulate there; the LCROSS results suggest several to tens of weight percent water ice may exist in the polar soils. Finally, some of this migrating water apparently collects at rates high enough so that significant soil cannot mix with it during normal impact bombardment, as shown by the presence of relatively “pure” water ice deposits in selected lunar craters imaged by radar.

A significant amount of water at the poles of the Moon is present, with many billions of metric tonnes at each pole (detailed estimates of the water reserves are in progress). Such an amount is more than enough to support both permanent, sustainable human presence on the Moon and for export to cislunar space. Water is useful as rocket fuel and energy storage (hydrogen and oxygen are the two most powerful chemical propellants known) and for life support (water and oxygen) in space. These new discoveries fundamentally alter our understanding of the Moon’s processes and history and highlight both it’s scientific value and utilization potential. The Moon is on the critical path to human expansion into the Solar System.

Addendum. In Comments, below Dr. Spudis original post, Pradeep Mohandas reminded the author of the findings of the Moon Impact Probe, released from Chandrayaan-1, which discovered water vapor in very small concentrations in the space just above the Moon during its descent to the south pole. "This exospheric water (i.e., water in extremely small concentrations) may be related to the time-variable water seen in the spectral data from M3, Cassini, and EPOXI — in other words, it may represent water molecules in motion, migrating toward the poles. Work on the nature and processes of the lunar hydrosphere continues, and I will keep you up to date on the latest research results on this new and exciting subtopic of lunar science."

Guenter Wendt, 85

"Pad leader -- or "pad führer" as the astronauts came to affectionately call him due to his strong German accent and unwavering rules -- Wendt oversaw the spacecraft on the launch pads and all who had access to them to ensure the safety of everyone involved."

Read the story at story, HERE.

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Tsiolkovskiy - Constellation Region of Interest


LROC Featured Image, April 30, 2010. Narrow-Angle Camera view of massive boulders on an outlying rampart of the complex central peak of Tsiolkovskiy, and within the Constellation Region of Interest. The full image is of and area roughly 700 meters wide (LROC NAC frame M113107391L) [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Maria Banks
LROC News System

Tsiolkovskiy Crater is 185 kilometers (115 miles) wide and located on the far side of the Moon. It's named after Russian scientist and visionary space pioneer Konstantin Tsiolkovskiy.

"The earth," Tsiolkovskiy wrote, "is the cradle of the mind. But one cannot live forever in a cradle."

The crater has a complex central peak, a smooth lava-flooded floor, a lunar lobate scarp located on the ejecta blanket near the crater rim and several other interesting geomorphological landforms and features that make Tsiolkovskiy an exciting destination for future human lunar exploration.


LROC Wide Angle Camera context image showing Tsiolkovskiy crater and the surrounding lunar highlands. The approximate position of LROC's Featured Image is shown by the white arrow [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Tsiolkovskiy's floor is covered with relatively smooth mare basalt that formed from pooling basalt that was erupted after the crater formed. The central peak, a large mountain near the center of the crater, is composed of material from beneath the crater floor that rebounded upward after being compressed during the impact event. Also visible are many boulders or pieces of the uplifted central peak that have broken off and accumulated on the crater floor. The relationship between some of the boulders and the mare basalt flows is complex. In some areas it appears that boulders are surrounded and partially covered by the basalt lava indicating that the lava formed more recently than the boulders. In others, the boulders look like they rest on top of the dark lava flows.

The biggest boulders in this view are up to ~25 m (over 80 feet) in length! This is roughly the length of a college basketball court or two school buses lined up lengthwise. In areas such as this, astronauts are able to easily collect and study rocks from the smooth mare crater floor as well as rocks that originated from beneath the lunar surface! You can also see on the floor of the crater multiple smaller craters that formed over time as small asteroids and comets impacted the Moon. Scientists can use counts and measurements of superposed craters to estimate when Tsiolkovskiy Crater formed - the more craters, the older the surface on which they lie.

For more information on LROC's observation campaign for the Constellation program Regions of Interest read this Lunar and Planetary Science Conference abstract, and visit the LRO Science Targeting Meeting website (look for the baseball card summary sheets for each site: part 1, part 2).

Read more about Tsiolkovskiy at Arizona State University's Apollo Digital Image of the Week.

Explore the Tsiolkovskiy Constellation region of interest for yourself!


HDTV still image of Tsiolkovskiy from Japan's lunar orbiter SELENE-1 (Kaguya, 2007-2009). The Naval Research Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and NASA have teamed up to design and deploy a radio telescope array on the floor of the far side crater, hoping to use the radio quiet of the side of the Moon blocked from the interferences of Earth and her billions to probe the cosmological "Dark Ages," a poorly understood time between the primeval fireball of the Big Bang and the formation of earliest galaxies [JAXA/NHK/SELENE].