Showing posts with label Gerasimovich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gerasimovich. Show all posts

Monday, October 4, 2010

Grand lunar swirls yielding to LRO Mini-RF

Swirls at Gerasimovich less than 10 centimeters deep
Orientale Antipodes - Goddard - the Grand Swirl field on the direct opposite side of the Moon from Mare Orientale. The broad area is coincident with crustal magnetism. LROC WAC (false color) Mosaic (689nm) from LRO orbits 4445-4450, June 13, 2010; avg. alt. 51.653 km, avg. res. 73.04 m [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Joel Raupe

Certain places on the Moon look freshly dusted with snow. Bright sweeping patterns,visible only from high overhead, look like cosmic cave paintings or the Nazca Lines in Peru. These bright ghostly patches or “swirls” appear on the Moon’s vast lava flats, atop mountains and often both simultaneously.

Similar phenomena have been cataloged on Mercury, and perhaps also on other “airless bodies” in the solar system, but none so far beat out the Moon's population of swirls.

Aside from their chaotic, ink blot patterns, these swirls are made of regolith that refuses to grow old. As authors of a new study appearing in the Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society put the case, regarding a familiar Near side landmark, "the degree of degradation of Descartes C suggests it should not be optically bright, yet it is."

But accepting the evidence of immature surfaces built up into something that "looks like the shadow” of invisible magnetic fields, crediting swirls to the crustal magnetism that inevitably accompanies them, has not been an easy thing for investigators to swallow.

The magnetic fields that accompany swirl albedo "anomalies" certainly seem old enough. Investigators believe a now-extinct global magnetic field became “shock-fossilized” into the Moon’s thicker crusts at points on the lunar globe opposite the basin-forming-impacts that created Mare Imbrium, Serenitatis and others of the more famous "seas" between 3.9 and 3.1 billion years ago. And intense crustal magnetism is definitely knotted tightly in places opposite those basins on the Moon.

At the antipodes of Mare Imbrium for example, around the fabulous albedo swirl patterns of Mare Ingenii, a very impressive magnetic field has been well-mapped. On maps of crustal magnetism the Far side's southern latitudes clearly mirror the Near side's major famous basins.


The Moon’s most intense magnetic field, strong enough in places to hollow-out a mini-magnetosphere in the solar wind, is found on the opposite side of the Moon from Mare Crisium, around the Far side Gerasimovich craters. Accompanying those fields are swirl albedo anomalies, though they are more difficult for the eye to trace out from the brighter highland terrain background.

Crisium Antipodes (Gerasimovich). Swirl albedo patterns here (like the "Mushroom" of Gerasimovich D - compare this image with the image immediately below) are sometimes not as easy to immediately recognize, unlike swirls appearing on darker basins, like Reiner Gamma in Oceanus Procellarum or upon the plains of Mare Ingenni. The above monochrome LROC WAC M102966996ME observation (LRO orbit 345, July 23, 2009) [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

The magic mushroom "swirl" at Gerasimovich D. The area surrounding 22.3°S, 237.5°E is antipodal to Mare Crisium. As persistent as lunar swirls appear to be, Mini-RF scans from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter indicate this swirl and others nearby are less than 10 centimeters thick.

As with many other features, things are different on the Near side. The most familiar swirl albedo-magnetic anomalies on the Near side do not seem to be "antipodal" to any basin. This hardly conclusive, but no known clue points to the existence of a buried basin (e.g., cryptomare and/or gravity anomaly) antipodal to the Near side swirls and magnetic fields at Reiner Gamma, west of Airy crater or at the Descartes formation, 60 km southeast of the Apollo 16 landing site.

The most renowned lunar swirl of them all is Reiner Gamma. (See "Another look at Reiner Gamma, June 30, 2010.) Near side swirls may be related to a different source of magnetism, just as Reiner Gamma seems optically entangled with rise and fall of lavas at Marius Hills.

Reiner Gamma seems optically related to the Marius Hills [7 image mosaic by Goryachko, Abgarian & Morozov (Astronominsk) - Minsk, Belarus - August 6, 2010].

The new study, based on data returned from the Mini-RF radar on board LRO, focuses attention on two strongly representative examples of the differences between albedo swirl-magnetic anomaly on the Near and Far sides. For the Far side investigators scanned area surfaces around the swirls of Gerasimovich and for a Near side sample the authors examined the Descartes formation, in particular the small crater Descartes C, on the northeastern rim of ancient Descartes, a 30 km-wide Near side landmark.

While the bright albedo on the grooved highland north of very ancient Descartes has been mapped and observed through modest telescopes for centuries the albedo wasn't identified as a swirl anomaly until the 21st century. A brilliant contrast becomes scattered in richer details when viewed up close, as in this false color montage image of 415 nm waveband light, just below the range of human vision, derived from three LROC WAC observations during the summer of 2009 [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Even though the vast family of lunar swirl phenomena had already been identified, though the bright patch on running northwest of Descartes C, like a dusting of snow, was not recognized as genuine swirl until 2001. Magnetometer data from end-of-mission low orbital passes (18 km) by Lunar Prospector in 1999 were later identified with now is thought to be the most intense magnetism on the Moon's Near side [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

My colleague Larry F. Scott and I were happy to learn the new Mini-RF study's authors (The Surficial Nature of Lunar Swirls as Revealed by Mini-RF on LRO; Neish, Blewett, Bussey, Lawrence, Mechtley, Thomson, Robinson and the Mini-RF Team - American Astronomical Society, DPS meeting #42, #18.06; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 42, p.979) selected Descartes C because their results are well in line with suggestions we put forth together in 2008.

The full text of the study published last week is not yet available to us, but the abstract was released and reads as follows:

Lunar swirls are optically bright, sinuous albedo features found on the Moon. Lunar swirls appear to overlay the lunar surface, apparently representing diffuse brightening of unmodified terrains. Lunar swirls are associated with regions of anomalously high crustal magnetic fields, but their exact formation mechanism is unknown. The Mini-RF synthetic aperture radar on LRO acquired a comprehensive set of radar images of these enigmatic features, including the first radar observations of swirls on the lunar farside. A few general remarks can be made about the nature of the lunar swirls from this data set.

First, the average radar properties of lunar swirls are identical to nearby non-swirl regions, in both total radar backscatter and circular polarization ratio (CPR). This implies that average decimeter-scale roughness and composition within the high-albedo portions of the swirls do not differ appreciably from the surroundings, and thus that the swirls are a very thin surface manifestation -less than 10 cm- not observable with S-Band radar.

Secondly, bright swirl material appears to be stratigraphically younger than an impact melt flow at Gerasimovich D newly discovered in Mini-RF images. This observation indicates that the swirls are capable of forming over timescales less than the age of the crater, perhaps less than 1 Ga. This data set also provides information about the origin of the lunar swirls. In at least one case, the presence of an enhanced crustal magnetic field appears to be responsible for the preservation of a high-albedo ejecta blanket around an otherwise degraded crater, Descartes C.

The degree of degradation of Descartes C suggests it should not be optically bright, yet it is. This suggests that the albedo is preserved due to its location within a magnetic anomaly, and hence supports an origin hypothesis that invokes interaction between the solar wind and the magnetic anomaly.


If we accept that magnetism can persist, in some places intensely, for almost 4 billion years, the optically immature regolith of their swirls cannot. Experiments show freshly "gardened" lunar regolith, such as the bright rays of 109 million year old Tycho, inevitably darken under the relentless solar wind in "only" 900 million years.

Accepting that locally intense magnetic fields can and do deflect solar wind they are too small to bend cosmic rays, which - though rarer- build up similar maturing affects over time. Neither can they deflect the micrometeorites that continuously “garden” the top 3 centimeters of lunar surface every two million years. Because lunar swirls cannot be as old as the magnetic fields where they congregate, some other, more dynamic mechanism has to be the source of their optically immaturity.

In 2008 we weakly suggested an interaction with the Moon's dusty, dynamic exosphere, a process where the believed migration of charged and levitated sub-micron-sized dust behaves differently in the presence of crustal magnetism. Thankfully, other studies by more qualified investigators, especially those working the Mini-RF team, have described just such a process earlier this year and with this most recent study.

Though other sources of regolith freshening probably exist, it may eventually be determined that dust migration is the source of swirl albedo phenomena, repelled and then blocked from reintroduction to the lunar surface in the presence of crustal magnetic fields. Such a process would continually allow certain areas on the Moon to remain eternally immature.

Additional Reading:
Another look at Reiner Gamma
June 30, 2010

LOLA: Goddard
June 26, 2010

LROC: Ingenii Swirls at Constellation ROI
May 26, 2010

Local Topography and Reiner Gamma
May 22, 2010

Lunar Swirl phenomena from LRO
May 17, 2010

The still-mysterious Descartes formation
May 10, 2010

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Using the Earth to study the Moon

Paul D. Spudis
The Once & Future Moon
Smithsonian Air & Space Blogs


Last week, the Science Team of the Mini-RF imaging radar experiment aboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission, met in Flagstaff, Arizona. We were there to conduct field studies of some interesting lunar analogs that occur in this area. Scientists study the planets through a variety of means, including images, remote-sensing, and sample return. One technique involves studying the processes and deposits of the Earth as a guide or analog to understanding similar features on the Moon and other bodies. Analogs have been studied since the beginning of the space program and have been essential to unraveling the complex histories of rocky objects in the Solar System.

The team gathered early Wednesday morning north of Flagstaff. Our field guides pictured the three areas we would spend the day visiting, along with geologically similar features found on the Moon. Our technique used airborne radar images of our targets: The SP cone and lava flow, Sunset Crater National Monument and Meteor Crater. Each site offers specific features that one can observe and walk across, using it as a guide toward understanding the same processes that have shaped our Moon. Our field trip illuminated the radar data in a “real world” environment, assisting us as we continue to explore and map with our instrument now orbiting the Moon.

The SP cone and flow is one of the most remarkable volcanic features in the region, with a beautifully symmetrical cinder cone and an extremely rough, blocky lava flow (Fig. 1; for full resolution versions of the surface pictures, click here: a, b, c). As viewed from the ground, the lava flow is blocky and extremely rough at the scale of the L-band radar wavelength (about 25 cm, or almost a foot). Steep flow fronts of blocky lava lie directly upon a smooth plateau of flat-lying sedimentary rocks. These remarkable flow fronts can be up to 50 m high (over 150 feet) and their rubbly, rugged fronts provide a spectacular contrast to the featureless plain upon which they rest. In the radar image, the lava flow is extremely bright, indicating high radar returns and its circular polarization ratio (CPR), one measure of its surface roughness at wavelength scales, is very high.


SP cone and flow, a very rough, fresh volcanic feature in northern Arizona. Radar image courtesy of L. Carter, Smithsonian Inst. (click to enlarge.)

The relations seen at the SP flow indicate the very high CPR features on the Moon could likewise represent very rough, block-rich surfaces. An example of such is the unusual flow of shock impact melt (not volcanic lava, although quite similar in terms of its physical properties) seen emanating from the far side crater Gerasimovich D (22°S, 122°W, 26 km diameter; Fig. 2). Both of these lobate flows (volcanic lava on the Earth, impact melt on the Moon) show high CPR, indicating the surface of the flow on the Moon probably has similar properties to the SP flow north of Flagstaff. One exception is that the mean block size on the Moon may be smaller, as the Mini-RF S-band radar has a shorter wavelength (12.6 cm or about 5 inches) than the longer wavelength AIRSAR L-band image (23 cm wavelength) of SP crater.


Gerasimovich D, directly on the opposite side of the Moon from Mare Crisium, is pictured showing an outflow of impact melt rock with high CPR, similar to the high CPR seen in the SP lava flow. This "Crisium Antipodes" is also site of the most intense crustal magnetism yet discovered on the Moon, sufficient to cavitate Solar Wind and to form a "mini-magnetosphere" over the area. (click to enlarge)

Fifteen miles away from the SP flow, an instructive set of geologic relations are seen at Sunset Crater National Monument (Fig. 3; for full resolution versions of the surface pictures, click here: d, e). At this feature, the extremely rough lava surface of the Bonito flow is in direct contact with smooth, ash mantled hills of the same age. This contact is shown by the sharp boundary between high CPR lava and the extremely low CPR ash-covered hills in the radar image. Such a relation is also evident on the Moon, where regional dark mantle deposits of lunar volcanic ash (such as the Sulpicius Gallus dark mantle on the rim of Mare Serenitatis) show low CPR, exactly as does its terrestrial counterpart. Once again, the Earth example allows us to better interpret our remote-sensing data for the Moon.


Sunset crater lava flow (high CPR) and ash deposits (low CPR). Radar image courtesy of L. Carter, Smithsonian Inst. (click to enlarge)

The Moon is covered with millions of impact craters and we were anxious to visit and compare the radar data of Meteor crater, the world’s first proven impact structure, with surface conditions within and near the crater rim to better understand the surface of the Moon. The rugged, blocky ejecta of rocks thrown out of the crater is evident by the radar bright halo surrounding Meteor crater (Fig. 4; for full resolution versions of the surface pictures, click here: g,h,i,j). On the ground, this is manifested by abundant boulders of rock, strewn about the outer rim of the crater. The crater interior is filled with ancient lake bed sediments. This fine-grained material results in lower radar echoes for the floor of Meteor crater than for its rocky walls and rim. Similar features are found in certain lunar craters where fine-grained material, moved downhill by gravity, partly fills the crater interiors. The afternoon’s hike down into and across the floor of Meteor crater gave all of us a better appreciation for the surface topography and conditions on the Moon. The climb back up to the rim, capped off our long day of field work.


Meteor Crater in Arizona, showing blocky, rough exterior rim deposits, wall outcrop, and fine-grained floor materials. AIRSAR radar image (click to enlarge)

Many of the geological features seen in radar images of the Earth are also seen in the radar images from the Moon. As we continue to map the Moon with the Mini-RF radar, the sometimes puzzling relations seen in the lunar data are understood better by comparison with Earth analogs. Our entire team acquired valuable insight into how the Moon works and what the surface is like from our day in the field. For a geologist, there is simply no substitute for directly observed field data to fully comprehend the complex history and processes of the Moon.

Equally interesting and important will be the insight and knowledge gained when we sample the Moon in more detail. The Moon has been described as a “dead planet” because compared to the Earth, which has rapid, dynamic processes of erosion, the Moon remains unchanged for millions of years. However, for its ability to retain the ancient historical record of the Earth-Moon system, advantage goes to the Moon. The multi-billion year records of impact and solar wind embedded in the lunar surface awaits our recovery, and will tell us about both the past and possible future of our home planet.

Monday, December 21, 2009

Inertia curves a Far Side boulder uphill?



Looking through the images and data released to the Planetary Data Systemas part of an informal test by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) team at Arizona State University, we poured over a rich boulder landslide field near 233.93°E, 24.46°S, or approximately 100 kilometers west by southwest of the Gerasimovich Swirl. We almost missed it, but our eyes were eventually drawn deep into the long shadows before sunset under LRO Orbit 347. Among many boulder trails we seem to have found one that's a little different. A rather sizable boulder appears to have rolled first downhill, as part of a larger chunk of debris. Part of it seems to actually have rebounded briefly and curved on a terrace back uphill. It then seems to have become lodged into the grade and then afterward become dislodged again, tipping forward where now rests [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].