Showing posts with label GCRs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GCRs. Show all posts

Saturday, February 21, 2015

CRaTER: Lunar Proton Albedo Anomalies

Figure 1. Top: Lunar albedo proton yield map (cylindrical projection) with anomalous yield regions labeled “A” through “E”. Regions A (Mare Serenitatis) and B (Oceanus Procellarum) are both centered near the boundaries of mare regions. Regions C, D and E are all in the highlands on the far side of the Moon. Bottom: Visible global composite image from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC).

LUNAR PROTON ALBEDO ANOMALIES:
SOIL, SURVEYORS, AND STATISTICS

J.K. Wilson, N. Schwadron and H. E. Spence, et al.
Space Science Center
University of New Hampshire, Durham

Introduction: Since the launch of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) in 2009, the Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) has been mapping albedo protons (~100 MeV) coming from the Moon [1,2].

These protons are produced by nuclear spallation, a consequence of galactic cosmic ray (GCR) bombardment of the lunar regolith. Just as spalled neutrons and gamma rays reveal elemental abundances in the lunar regolith [3-6], albedo protons may be a complimentary method for mapping compositional variations across the Moon’s surface.

Albedo Proton Yield: The CRaTER instrument simultaneously detects albedo protons from the Moon and GCRs arriving from the zenith direction. We divide the number of albedo protons observed over each point on the Moon by the number of GCRs detected over the same location to produce a map of the yield of albedo protons.

We presently find that the lunar maria have an average proton yield which is 0.9% ± 0.3% higher than the average yield in the highlands; this is consistent with some neutron data that shows a similar yield dichotomy due to differences in the average atomic weight between mare regolith and highland regolith [7].

Map Features: There are cases where two or more adjacent pixels (15° × 15°) in the map have significantly anomalous yields above or below the mean.

These include two high-yielding regions in the maria, and three low-yielding regions in the far-side highlands. Some of the regions could be artifacts of Poisson noise, but for completeness we consider possible effects from compositional anomalies in the lunar regolith, including pyroclastic flows, antipodes of fresh craters, and so-called "red spots" which are associated with volcanic domes. We also consider man-made landers and crash sites that may have brought elements not normally found in the lunar regolith.

References: [1] Wilson, J. K. et al. (2012) JGR, 117, E00H23. [2] Spence, H. E. et al. (2012) Space Weather, 11, 643-650. [3] Feldman W. C. et al. (1998) Science, 281, 1496-1500. [4] Gasnault, O. et al. (2001) GRL, 28, 3797-3800. [5] Maurice, S. et al. (2004) JGR, 109, E07S04. [6] Mitrofanov, I. G. et al. (2010) Science, 330, 483-486. [7] Litvak, M. L. et al. (2012) JGR, 117, E00H22.

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

The lunar forensic files

View of the Moon at gamma-ray wavelengths, as imaged by the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory satellite.  These gamma rays are induced by the collision of cosmic rays with the lunar surface, the same process recently found able to synthesize organic molecules in lunar polar ice deposits [Dave Thompson (NASA/GSFC) et al., EGRET, Compton Observatory].
Paul Spudis
The Once and Future Moon
Smithsonian Air & Space

A recent study indicates that water ice and simple molecules of carbon and nitrogen might form the seed material for more complex substances, some of which might ultimately be involved in the origin of life.  The work from the University of Hawaii took measurements of the levels of cosmic radiation from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and applied it to a composition similar to that observed by the impacting LCROSS probe at the south pole of the Moon.  

As you may recall, this probe found both water vapor and ice particles ejected by the impact in one of the permanently dark regions near the pole; it also observed additional compounds, including methane, ammonia and some other simple organic molecules.  These substances are present in cometary ices and thus, it was thought that their presence could indicate a cometary origin for the Moon’s polar ice.

The new work does not negate that interpretation, but adds complexity to the puzzle by showing that it may be possible to manufacture some of the more complex organic molecules from the simple substances found in cosmic ice, whether deposited from the nuclei of impacting comets or made in place within the cold traps of the lunar poles.  Once again, we find that the polar regions of the Moon are even more interesting scientifically than we had thought.

The generation of new and more complex organic compounds must be a surficial process since material buried at levels deeper than a couple of meters is shielded from even the most energetic cosmic rays.  For this reason, the material observed during the LCROSS impact is likely of cometary origin because most of the ejecta created by that impact comes from depths of a few meters.  While material in the lunar surface is overturned by impact gardening, such overturn is extremely slow (rates of overturn below about 1 meter depth occur on timescales of greater than 1 billion years, the same timescale on which this radiation-induced production occurs).

The generation of complex organic molecules is an important topic of research for the origin of life.  Most scientific strategies focus on the search for extraterrestrial life in more Earth-like environments, such as a previously warmer and wetter Mars or in the hypothesized deep oceans of Europa.  A few studies have focused on the physical processes of organic chemistry, specifically the generation of complex molecules in space, within small bodies such as cometary nuclei and on primitive planetary surfaces, such as the polar deposits of the Moon and Mercury.  Findings to date show that complex organic substances are generated in a variety of environments and under a variety of energetic conditions.

Because they date from early in Solar System history and contain the materials needed for living systems (water and organic matter), comets have long been thought to be the seedbeds of life.  Comets are remnants of the original solar nebula, the cloud of debris out of which our Solar System formed.  At a certain position and beyond in the nebula, water is stable in solid form (the so-called “frost line”); in our Solar System, the frost line is between the orbits of Jupiter and Mars.  Water in nebular material inside this line vaporized and was dissipated by the solar wind, some blown outward and some disassociated by ultraviolet radiation.  But water outside of the frost line can condense into ice particles, which then may be accreted into planetary objects.  The smallest and most water-rich of these objects are the comets, most of which originate far beyond the frost line in the most distant regions of our Solar System (the so-called “Oort cloud”).  Larger icy objects in the outer Solar System include the satellites of the Jovian planets, which are predominantly made of water ice with minor amounts of admixed rocky material.  The inner (terrestrial) planets such as Earth and Mars are made mostly of rocky material but contain minor amounts of water, a consequence of their incorporation of cometary material during assembly and subsequent impact bombardment.

This last process operates on the Moon as well.  Because the Moon represents a stable, unchanging environment over billions of years, it accumulates the evidence and detritus of the impact history of that era.  Most of the volatile component of this impacting debris is lost from the Moon, but any of it that becomes trapped in the cold, dark areas near the poles remains there forever.  The poles of the Moon are thus a natural laboratory for the study of one of the early processes in Solar System history – the creation of complex organic substances from the more primitive and simple elements and compounds.  In this sense, the pre-biotic organic chemistry of the lifeless and barren Moon serves the cause of the study of life’s processes and origin.

As we continue to study the Moon, we find that it offers much more than one might suspect at first glance.  The Moon’s early history reveals the secrets of planetary assembly, impact bombardment, global melting and differentiation into core, mantle and crust.  Its middle history tells us about the thermal evolution of planets, as internal heat spawned the volcanism that resurfaced part of the Moon and operates on all of the terrestrial planets.  The continued impact history recorded in the Moon’s surface layer documents a phase of Earth history missing from our terrestrial geological record, including the possibility of episodic waves of impacts that are at least partly responsible for extinctions of life recorded in the fossil record.  This same surficial layer also records the history and output of our Sun, the provider of energy to the planets and the principal driver of climate change on Earth.  The interconnections between the various branches of lunar science with the other sciences grow more evident and more significant over time.

This new research makes the recently renewed interest in the value of the Moon and new lunar missions more comprehensible.  Far from being a mere echo of some previous space glory, a return to the Moon to undertake new scientific studies, new exploration and to develop a wholly new set of technologies impacts all of space science and exploration in many different and unexpected ways.  Insights into the origins of life can come from detailed examination of lunar polar volatiles.  These same materials can also enable travel to more distant destinations and open up Earth-Moon space to economic development.  In both cases, lunar return will enable and facilitate our understanding and movement into space.

As my colleague David Lawrence of APL put it, “One of the take-homes is, go back to the moon and look.  Dig up samples, see what’s there.”  Sound advice.

Related:
Crites, Lucey & Lawrence
Icarus, Vol. 226, No. 2, Nov.–Dec. 2013, pg. 1192–1200

The Moon's metallic water (February 27, 2011)

Committee on the Evaluation of Radiation Shielding for Space Exploration
National Research Council

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

More from CRaTER on radiation health hazards

CRaTER, in a fifth year in lunar orbit aboard LRO is providing a solid data set on the real health hazards, and possible mitigation, of high-energy radiation in deep space. Using proven technologies cosmic, not solar, radiation, is a significant block to long-term human spaceflight beyond the Moon [NASA/GSFC/UNH/SwRI].
David Sims
University of New Hampshire
Institute for the Sutdy of Earth, Oceans and Space


Scientists from the University of New Hampshire and colleagues have published comprehensive findings on space-based radiation as measured by a UNH-led detector aboard NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). The data provide critical information on the radiation hazards that will be faced by astronauts on extended missions to deep space such as those to Mars.

The papers in a special issue of the journal Space Weather document and quantify measurements made since 2009 by the Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) radiation detector.

"These data are a fundamental reference for the radiation hazards in near Earth 'geospace' out to Mars and other regions of our sun's vast heliosphere," says CRaTER principal investigator Nathan Schwadron of the UNH Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space (EOS).

The space environment poses significant risks to both humans and satellites due to harmful radiation from galactic cosmic rays and solar energetic particles that can easily penetrate typical shielding and damage electronics. When this radiation impacts biological cells, it can cause an increased risk of cancer.

Standard spacecraft shielding, integrated into hull design,
is strong protection from most solar radiation, but defeats
this purpose with high-energy cosmic rays it simply
splits into deadly showers of secondary particles
[NAS].
Before CRaTER's long-term radiation measurements were derived using a material called "tissue-equivalent plastic" - a stand-in for human muscle capable of gauging radiation dosage - those hazards were not sufficiently well characterized to determine if long missions outside low-Earth orbit can be accomplished with acceptable risk.

CRaTER's seminal measurements now provide quantified, radiation hazard data from lunar orbit and can be used to calculate radiation dosage from deep space down to airline altitudes.

The data will be crucial in developing techniques for shielding against space-based radiation dosage. The measurements have also played a vital role in UNH space scientists' efforts to develop both the first Web-based tool for predicting and forecasting the radiation environment in near-Earth, lunar, and Martian space environments and a space radiation detector that possesses unprecedented performance capabilities.

The near real-time prediction/forecasting tool known as PREDICCS integrates for the first time numerical models of space radiation and a host of real-time measurements being made by satellites currently in space. It provides updates of the radiation environment on an hourly basis and archives the data weekly, monthly, and yearly - an historical record that provides a clear picture of when a safe radiation dose limit is reached for skin or blood-forming organs, for example.

CRaTER offers an opportunity to test the capability of PREDICCS to accurately describe the lunar radiation environment. The Space Weather special issue provides comparisons between dose rates produced by PREDICCS with those measured by CRaTER during three major solar energetic particle events that occurred in 2012.

The detector developed at UNH, known as DoSEN, short for Dose Spectra from Energetic Particles and Neutrons, measures and calculates the absorbed dose in matter and tissue resulting from the exposure to indirect and direct ionizing radiation, which can change cells at the atomic level and lead to irreparable damage. Schwadron is lead scientist for both the PREDICCS and the DoSEN project.

"DoSEN is an innovative concept that will lead to a new generation of radiation detectors, or dosimeters, to aid in understanding the hazards posed by the radiation environment of space," says Schwadron. "The ability to accurately understand these hazards will be critical to protect astronauts sent beyond low-Earth orbit on extended space missions."

DoSEN combines two advanced, complementary radiation detection concepts that present fundamental advantages over traditional dosimetry. The dosimeter measures both the energy and the charge distribution of energetic particles that affect human and robotic health in a way not presently possible with current technology. Protons, heavy ions, and neutrons all contribute significantly to the radiation hazard.

"Understanding how different particles such as neutrons and heavy ions pose hazards will be extremely important in completely characterizing the types of environments we will operate in," Schwadron says. "For example, on the Moon, there are additional hazards from neutrons that are created by high-energy radiation interacting in the lunar soil and radiating outward from the surface."

That 'backsplash" of protons, which was discovered by CRaTER and is known as the Moon's radiation "albedo," is caused by the partial reflection of galactic cosmic rays off the moon's surface. This creates a surprising one-two punch of deadly radiation and can also be used to peer below the lunar surface like a geological probe.

Says Harlan Spence, CRaTER deputy lead scientist and director of EOS, "Until now, people have not had the 'eyes' necessary to see this particular population of particles. With CRaTER, we just happen to have the right focus to make these discoveries."

UNH team members on the CRaTER instrument and co-authors on the Space Weather papers include Schwadron, Spence, Sonya Smith, Mike Golightly, Jody Wilson and Colin Joyce, Jason Legere, and Cary Zeitlin of the Southwest Research Institute Earth, Oceans, and Space Department at UNH. Coauthors from the UNH Space Science Center on the DoSEN project include James Ryan, Peter Bloser, and Chris Bancroft.
CRaTER-schematic
Figure 1. Wilson, et al, "First Albedo Proton Map of the Moon," Diagram of CRaTER instrument showing cross-sectional cutaway view of the stack of six detectors (D1–D6) and pieces of tissue equivalent plastic (TEP). Example particle trajectories are shown for a high-energy galactic cosmic ray from the zenith passing completely through the instrument (red line) and for an albedo proton (blue line) coming up from the lunar surface and passing through four detectors before being stopped in one of the blocks of TEP. (Adapted from Spence et al. [2010].)

Additional Background from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center:

Paul Gabrielsen
 
Radiation in deep space comes from cosmic rays, from the solar wind and from solar energetic particles emanated during a solar storm. Particles from these sources rocket through space. Many can pass right through matter, such as our bodies. So-called ionizing radiation knocks electrons off of atoms within our bodies, creating highly reactive ions. Within Earth's protective atmosphere and magnetic field, we receive low doses of background radiation every day. The radiation hazards astronauts face are serious, yet manageable thanks to research endeavors such as the CRaTER instrument.

CRaTER measures realistic human radiation doses at the moon using a unique material called tissue-equivalent plastic (TEP). Two pieces of this plastic, roughly 2 inches and 1 inch thick, respectively, are separated by silicon radiation detectors. The TEP-detector combo measures how much radiation may actually reach human organs, which may be less than the amount that reaches the spacecraft.

"Tissue-equivalent plastic gives us an idea of the self-shielding of the body," said Larry Townsend, of the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. "The radiation spectrum at the organs is not going to be the same as the radiation spectrum that's outside the spacecraft."

Townsend notes that CRaTER's observations have come at a time when solar activity, and hence the solar wind, has been unusually quiet. The solar wind disperses some galactic cosmic rays, but in the current solar lull, more of these rays are able to bombard the Earth and moon. CRaTER, which launched aboard LRO with six other instruments in 2009, has been able to monitor the lunar environment as solar activity has declined. Further mission extensions would allow additional detailed measurements as solar activity waxes and wanes.

"They're lower-level exposures," Townsend said, of galactic cosmic rays, "but they're damaging in the sense that the particles are highly charged and heavy, and they create a lot of damage when they're going through the body."

But lab tests suggested that materials rich in hydrogen, such as some plastics, may shield against these heavy particles, said Cary Zeitlin of the Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas. "The tissue-equivalent plastic in CRaTER has fairly high hydrogen content," he said, "so it lets us test this hypothesis using data from deep space. And it turns out that plastic really is a good shield against these particles, significantly better than aluminum."

LRO's unofficial motto states that "exploration enables science, and science enables exploration." The LRO spacecraft launched as an exploration mission, a forerunner for humanity's return to the moon. But after completing its primary mission in 2010, LRO has become a powerful instrument for lunar and planetary science. CRaTER is an active participant in this scientific study, discovering a previously unmeasured source of hazardous radiation emanating from the moon itself.

This radiation comes from the partial reflection, also called an albedo, of galactic cosmic rays off the moon's surface. Galactic cosmic ray protons penetrate as much as a meter (about 3.2 feet) into the lunar surface, bombarding the material within and creating a spray of secondary radiation and a mix of high-energy particles that flies back out into space. This galactic cosmic ray albedo, which may interact differently with various chemical structures, could provide another method to remotely map the minerals present at the moon's surface.

CRaTER directly measured the proton component of the moon's radiation albedo for the first time, said Harlan Spence, deputy principal investigator at the University of New Hampshire. The TEP radiation detector measures various components of radiation separately, which enables CRaTER to, in Spence's words, "unfold" the energy spectrum of the radiation albedo. This result, he said, illustrates the value of combining exploration and science in spaceflight. "If we had been on a different science-oriented mission, we probably would've developed a different instrument," Spence said. "In fact, we probably never would have flown TEP."

Looking toward future missions, Schwadron and his colleagues are developing a next-generation radiation dose detector, drawing on CRaTER's design. The detector, called Dose Spectra from Energetic particles and Neutrons (DoSEN) builds on CRaTER's ability to break radiation down into its components and assess the doses resulting from each part of the radiation spectrum. Human exploration will benefit, Schwadron said, from this "very specific information about the spectrum of radiation we need to shield against."

Spence, who served as the instrument's principal investigator through the primary mission said he's proud of his team's foresight to equip CRaTER with the capability to accomplish its mission and continue to pursue great science.

"We had hopes and aspirations," he said, "but we didn't think we would be able to reap as much from those data as we are. Exploration now is enabling science."

Related Posts:
Cosmic Ray threat to manned spaceflight tested on MSL (May 31, 2013)
The radiation environment and its effects on human spaceflight: A Lunar Mission (January 5, 2013)
Cosmic ray flux effects lunar ice (March 19, 2012)
"A Perfect Storm of Cosmic Rays" (September 29, 2009)
Cosmic rays and manned space travel (September 16, 2009)
Cosmic ray flux highest ever recorded (September 3, 2009)
Returning to the Moon (August 9, 2009)
Skeptical: LUNAR-TEX radiation blanket (May 11, 2009)
NASA cataract detection down to Earth (January 18, 2009)
NASA and Congress sacrifice radiation shielding flexibility
removing dry landing hardware
(May 17, 2008)

Managing Space Radiation Risk in the New Era of Space Exploration (2008)
Committee on the Evaluation of Radiation Shielding for Space Exploration
National Research Council

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

CRaTER on LRO shows lighter materials may better mitigate cosmic ray health risks

As CRaTER, flying with LRO, closes out a fourth year in lunar orbit, long duration exposure to cosmic rays while traveling within and beyond Earth's magnetic field shows materials lighter than traditional aluminum and titanium alloyed hulls may reduce the probability of Radiation Exposure Induced Death (REID) [NASA/GSFC/UHN/SwRI].
University of New Hampshire - Durham –- Space scientists from the University of New Hampshire (UNH) and the Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) report that data gathered by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) show lighter materials like plastics provide effective shielding against the radiation hazards faced by astronauts during extended space travel. The finding could help reduce health risks to humans on future missions into deep space.

Aluminum has always been the primary material in spacecraft construction, but it provides relatively little protection against high-energy cosmic rays and can add so much mass to spacecraft that they become cost-prohibitive to launch.

The scientists have published their findings online in the American Geophysical Union journal Space Weather. Titled “Measurements of Galactic Cosmic Ray Shielding with the CRaTER Instrument,” the work is based on observations made by the Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) on board the LRO spacecraft. Lead author of the paper is Cary Zeitlin (zeitlin@boulder.swri.edu) of the SwRI Earth, Oceans, and Space Department at UNH. Co-author Nathan Schwadron of the UNH Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space is the principal investigator for CRaTER.

“This is the first study using observations from space to confirm what has been thought for some time—that plastics and other lightweight materials are pound-for-pound more effective for shielding against cosmic radiation than aluminum," Zeitlin said. "Shielding can’t entirely solve the radiation exposure problem in deep space, but there are clear differences in effectiveness of different materials.”

The plastic-aluminum comparison was made in earlier ground-based tests using beams of heavy particles to simulate cosmic rays. “The shielding effectiveness of the plastic in space is very much in line with what we discovered from the beam experiments, so we’ve gained a lot of confidence in the conclusions we drew from that work,” says Zeitlin. “Anything with high hydrogen content, including water, would work well.”

The space-based results were a product of CRaTER’s ability to accurately gauge the radiation dose of cosmic rays after passing through a material known as “tissue-equivalent plastic,” which simulates human muscle tissue. 

Prior to CRaTER and recent measurements by the Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD) on the Mars rover Curiosity, the effects of thick shielding on cosmic rays had only been simulated in computer models and in particle accelerators, with little observational data from deep space.

The CRaTER observations have validated the models and the ground-based measurements, meaning that lightweight shielding materials could safely be used for long missions, provided their structural properties can be made adequate to withstand the rigors of spaceflight.

Since LRO’s launch in June 2009, the CRaTER instrument has been measuring energetic charged particles— often very heavy and spectacularly energetic particles traveling at nearly the speed of light and cause detrimental health effects—from galactic cosmic rays and solar particle events (SPE's). 

Fortunately, Earth’s thick atmosphere and strong magnetic field provide adequate shielding against these dangerous high-energy particles.

To view the Space Weather article (behind academic pay wall), visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/swe.20043/abstract

For more on the CRaTER instrument, visit http://crater.sr.unh.edu/ and for the LRO mission visit http://lunar.gsfc.nasa.gov/mission.html.

Related Posts:

Friday, May 31, 2013

Cosmic ray threat to manned spaceflight tested on MSL

The MSL cruise phase as unmanned proxy for Orion, testing the deep space radiation environment [NASA].
Employing present, proven technology manned space travel to Mars exceeds NASA’s own limits on astronaut radiation exposure. That limit is calculated in terms of risk of “Radiation Exposure Induced Death,” or “REID,” over an individual astronaut’s life expectancy.

Ironically, as astronauts age their risk of eventually dying from causes unrelated to radiation exposure steadily increase. It’s the kind of risk coldly calculated by insurance providers. Though dying of undiagnosed heart disease is fed into the calculus, such other threats to the older astronaut's long-term survival overshadow their cumulative risk of REID.

None of this is news. This fly in the ointment in need of being overcome before humans can safely experience long-duration spaceflight beyond Earth’s magnetic field was starkly spelled out in the influential “ (2007),” a report put together by the National Academy of Science before the Constellation program was cancelled. The hard numbers have been gathered from the opening of the Space Age, from Explorer 1 through Apollo, from the Voyagers through the International Space Station.

Now these projections have been verified again by an instrument that traveled to Mars with Curiosity.

The lead investigators for these sensors announced their results during a NASA audio press conference Thursday. Dr. Cary Zeitlin, a principal scientist in the Southwest Research Institute’s (SwRI) Space Science and Engineering Division discussed detailed measurements of energetic and highly-ionizing particle radiation gathered during the 253 day, 560 million km journey to deliver the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) “Curiosity” rover to the floor of Gail crater on Mars.

The Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD) made detailed measurements of the energetic particle radiation environment inside the spacecraft, providing important insights for future human missions to Mars.

NASA/JPL/SwRI
"In terms of accumulated dose, it's like getting a whole-body CT scan once every five or six days," said Dr. Cary Zeitlin, a principal scientist in SwRI's Space Science and Engineering Division and lead author of Measurements of Energetic Particle Radiation in Transit to Mars on the Mars Science Laboratory, scheduled for publication in the journal Science on May 31.

"Understanding the radiation environment inside a spacecraft carrying humans to Mars or other deep space destinations is critical for planning future crewed missions," Zeitlin said. "Based on RAD measurements, unless propulsion systems advance rapidly, a large share of mission radiation exposure will be during outbound and return travel, when the spacecraft and its inhabitants will be exposed to the radiation environment in interplanetary space, shielded only by the spacecraft itself."

Titanium alloy in the hull of a manned spacecraft is a good shield
against most solar particle events, but counter-productive against
the heaviest cosmic rays. These heavy nucleons split and shower
damage into human tissue.
Two forms of radiation pose potential health risks to astronauts in deep space: a chronic low dose of galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) and the possibility of short-term exposures to the solar energetic particles (SEPs) associated with solar flares and coronal mass ejections. Radiation dose is measured in units of Sievert (Sv) or milliSievert (1/1000 Sv). Long-term population studies have shown that exposure to radiation increases a person's lifetime cancer risk; exposure to a dose of 1 Sv is associated with a 5 percent increase in fatal cancer risk.

GCRs tend to be highly energetic, highly penetrating particles that are not stopped by the modest shielding provided by a typical spacecraft. These high-energy particles include a small percentage of so-called heavy ions, which are atomic nuclei without their usual complement of electrons. Heavy ions are known to cause more biological damage than other types of particles.

The solar particles of concern for astronaut safety are typically protons with kinetic energies up to a few hundred MeV (one MeV is a million electron volts). Solar events typically produce very large fluxes of these particles, as well as helium and heavier ions, but rarely produce higher-energy fluxes similar to GCRs. The comparatively low energy of typical SEPs means that spacecraft shielding is much more effective against SEPs than GCRs.

"A vehicle carrying humans into deep space would likely have a 'storm shelter' to protect against solar particles. But the GCRs are harder to stop and, even an aluminum hull a foot thick wouldn't change the dose very much," said Zeitlin.

"The RAD data show an average GCR dose equivalent rate of 1.8 milliSieverts per day in cruise. The total during just the transit phases of a Mars mission would be approximately .66 Sv for a round trip with current propulsion systems," said Zeitlin. Time spent on the surface of Mars might add considerably to the total dose equivalent, depending on shielding conditions and the duration of the stay. Exposure values that ensure crews will not exceed the various space agencies standards are less than 1 Sv.

"Scientists need to validate theories and models with actual measurements, which RAD is now providing. These measurements will be used to better understand how radiation travels through deep space and how it is affected and changed by the spacecraft structure itself," says Donald M. Hassler, a program director at Southwest Research Institute and principal investigator of the RAD investigation. "The spacecraft protects somewhat against lower energy particles, but others can propagate through the structure unchanged or break down into secondary particles."

Only about 5 percent of the radiation dose was associated with solar particles, both because it was a relatively quiet period in the solar cycle and due to shielding provided by the spacecraft. Crew exposures during a human mission back and forth to Mars would depend on the habitat shielding and the unpredictable nature of large SEP events. Even so, the results are representative of a trip to Mars under conditions of low to moderate solar activity.

"This issue will have to be addressed, one way or another, before humans can go into deep space for months or years at a time," said Zeitlin.

SwRI, together with Christian Albrechts University in Kiel, Germany, built RAD with funding from the NASA Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate and Germany's national aerospace research center, DLR.


Scientific Context for the Exploration of the Moon (2007)
Space Studies Board
National Research Council

Saturday, January 5, 2013

The Radiation environment and its effect on human spaceflight: A Lunar Mission

Relative monthly infall of galactic cosmic rays from 1958 through December 2012 shows the inverse relationship with solar activity. The highest GCR infall rate (since the beginning of the Space Age) was recorded in late 2009 (arrow), occurring at the same time was the latest and unusually lengthy solar minimum [Moscow Neutron Monitor].
João Sabino
Instituto Superior Técnico
Lisboa, Portugal

This work is an overview of the quantities and concepts common in radiation physics and describes the types of radiation important to planning crewed missions to the Moon. Radiation effects on biological tissue and the consequences to astronaut health are addressed.

The environment of a mission to the Moon was simulated based on data obtained with the CREME program along with data from Lunar Prospector neutron measurements. The virtual mission was divided into stages of a trajectory: Low Earth Orbit, traversing the Van Allen Radiation Belts (VARB), the geostationary orbit radiation environment (GEO), lunar orbit and surface radiation environments. 

Major details in the development of a software application in Geant4 (CERN) are presented. The application was used to reproduce the transport of radiation particles through matter, to simulate the physics involved and to obtain the resulting absorbed dose, equivalent dose and the spectre of secondary radiation. The quantities were evaluated for solar minimum, solar maximum, and solar conditions wre evaluated for each mission phase.

The radiation environment in the solar system presents the main constraint to human spaceflight outside Earth's protecting radiation belts.

As the human presence in space tends to increase, or the will to reach other planets grows, radiation in space becomes a more compelling obstacle that needs to be dealt with. The risks that radiation exposure presents to space missions directly effects mission planing. For this reason a good knowledge of the radiation environment in all mission phases is essential. Development of reliable prediction tools is of major importance to assist mission planing and assure minimum safety for the crew.

This work pretends to explain subjects that need to be taken into account to understand problems space radiation pose to human spaceflight, taking as an example the case of a real lunar mission scenario and also documenting the development of software simulating the radiation environment and analyzing the effects of exposure.

Robotic space exploration looks promising in the immediate future, but despite huge advantages many scientists acknowledge it is not sufficient alone, that humans are needed in space to perform more complex research tasks such as field geology and the acquisition and analysis of samples.

This is a strong incentive towards human spaceflight and also a natural drive based on curiosity and adventure the human being has shown in this kind of challenge that lead us to go farther and farther; not to mention technological and industrial advancements always associated with meeting such challenges. Nowdays, even the tourism industry has begun to recognize space as an interesting destination for the wealthy, and some companies have already flown tourists to the International Space Station.

Human space exploration beyond LEO is presumably going to reemerge very soon, especially if some of the present risk it poses are minimized.

Download or read the study (pdf), HERE.

Cosmic ray flux effects lunar ice (March 19, 2012)
a perfect storm of cosmic rays” (September 29, 2009)
Cosmic rays and manned space travel (September 16, 2009)
Cosmic ray flux highest ever recorded (September 3, 2009)
LUNAR-TEX radiation blanket: Skeptical (May 11, 2009)

Managing Space Radiation Risk in the New Era of Space Exploration (2008)
Committee on the Evaluation of Radiation Shielding for Space Exploration
National Research Council

Monday, March 19, 2012

Cosmic ray flux effects lunar ice

Space scientists from the University of New Hampshire and colleagues report they have quantified levels of radiation on the Moon's surface from galactic cosmic ray (GCR) bombardment that over time causes chemical changes in water ice and can create complex carbon chains similar to those that help form the foundations of life.

The radiation process causes the lunar regolith to optically mature (OMAT), or darken, over time; important in understanding the geologic history of the Moon.

Scientists present their findings online in the American Geophysical Union's Journal of Geophysical Research. "Lunar Radiation Environment and Space Weathering from the Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER)," is based on measurements made by the CRaTER instrument on-board NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). 

The paper's lead author is Nathan Schwadron, an associate professor of physics at the UNH Space Science Center within the Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space (EOS). Co-author Harlan Spence is the director of EOS and lead scientist for the CRaTER instrument.

The telescope provides the fundamental measurements needed to test our understanding of the lunar radiation environment and shows that "space weathering" of the lunar surface by energetic radiation is an important agent for chemical alteration. CRaTER measures material interactions of GCRs and solar energetic particles (SEPs), both of which present formidable hazards for human exploration and spacecraft operations. CRaTER characterizes the global lunar radiation environment and its biological impacts by measuring radiation behind a "human tissue-equivalent" plastic.

Serendipitously, the LRO mission made measurements during a period when GCR fluxes remained at the highest levels ever observed in the space age due to the Sun's abnormally extended quiet cycle. During this quiescent period, the diminished power, pressure, flux and magnetic flux of the solar wind allowed GCRs and SEPs to more readily interact with objects they encountered -- particularly bodies such as our Moon, which has no atmosphere to shield the blow.
The arrival of cosmic rays at Earth, far more of a threat to survival than solar radiation, more than doubles on average when the Sun is relatively quiet. The peak in neutron flux since 1958 (at right) occurred during the unusually long solar minima 2009-2010, "serendipitously" coincident to the beginning of LRO's mission and the CRaTER instrument on-board [Moscow Neutron Monitor].
"This has provided us with a unique opportunity because we've never made these types of measurements before over an extended period of time, which means we've never been able to validate our models," notes Schwadron. "Now we can put this whole modeling field on more solid footing and project GCR dose rates from the present period back through time when different interplanetary conditions prevailed." This projection will provide a clearer picture of the effects of GCRs on airless bodies through the history of the solar system.

Moreover, CRaTER's recent findings also provide further insight into radiation as a double-edge sword. That is, while cosmic radiation does pose risks to astronauts and even spacecraft, it may have been a fundamental agent of change on celestial bodies by irradiating water ice and causing chemical alterations. Specifically, the process releases oxygen atoms from water ice, which are then free to bind with carbon to form large molecules that are "prebiotic" organic molecules.

In addition to being able to accurately gauge the radiation environment of the past, the now more robust models can also be used more effectively to predict potential radiation hazards spawned by GCRs and SEPs.

Says Schwadron, "Our validated models will be able to answer the question of how hazardous the space environment is and could be during these high-energy radiation events, and the ability to do this is absolutely necessary for any manned space exploration beyond low-Earth orbit."

Indeed, current models were in agreement with radiation dose rates measured by CRaTER, which together demonstrates the accuracy of the Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Module (EMMREM) being developed at UNH. EMMREM integrates a variety of models describing radiation effects in the Earth-Moon-Mars and interplanetary space environments and has now been validated to show its suitability for real-time space weather prediction.

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

"a perfect storm of cosmic rays..."

Joel Raupe
Lunar Pioneer

Though I've been nursing a bit of Cassandra Complex, accurate in making observations but cursed with having no one believe us, on September 3 we reported the Cosmic Ray flux seemed to be the "highest ever recorded. "

Thankfully, we did not have to wait much longer before someone more credible, in this case Dr. Tony Phillips, noted the same thing. Today, a month later, NASA's ScienceNews reports the same conclusion, noted also by ESA scientists last spring, at the official end of the long tour of Ulysses.

For the record, we continue to believe measurements of GCR flux in the inner solar system, so problematic to the future of manned space exploration and in furthering our understanding of the real-time mood of our own variable star is a better gauge of the Sunspot Cycle than are counts of the frequency of sunspots, as admittedly useful and visually stunning as they are.


Energetic iron nuclei counted by the Cosmic Ray Isotope Spectrometer on NASA's ACE spacecraft reveal that cosmic ray levels have jumped 19% above the previous Space Age high. [larger image]


Cosmic Rays hit Space Age high

Planning a trip to Mars? Take plenty of shielding. According to sensors on NASA's ACE (Advanced Composition Explorer) spacecraft, galactic cosmic rays have just hit a Space Age high.

"In 2009, cosmic ray intensities have increased 19% beyond anything we've seen in the past 50 years," says Richard Mewaldt of Caltech. "The increase is significant, and it could mean we need to re-think how much radiation shielding astronauts take with them on deep-space missions."

The cause of the surge is solar minimum, a deep lull in solar activity that began around 2007 and continues today. Researchers have long known that cosmic rays go up when solar activity goes down. Right now solar activity is as weak as it has been in modern times, setting the stage for what Mewaldt calls "a perfect storm of cosmic rays."

"We're experiencing the deepest solar minimum in nearly a century," says Dean Pesnell of the Goddard Space Flight Center, "so it is no surprise that cosmic rays are at record levels for the Space Age."

Galactic cosmic rays come from outside the solar system. They are subatomic particles--mainly protons but also some heavy nuclei--accelerated to almost light speed by distant supernova explosions. Cosmic rays cause "air showers" of secondary particles when they hit Earth's atmosphere; they pose a health hazard to astronauts; and a single cosmic ray can disable a satellite if it hits an unlucky integrated circuit.

The sun's magnetic field is our first line of defense against these highly-charged, energetic particles. The entire solar system from Mercury to Pluto and beyond is surrounded by a bubble of magnetism called "the heliosphere." It springs from the sun's inner magnetic dynamo and is inflated to gargantuan proportions by the solar wind. When a cosmic ray tries to enter the solar system, it must fight through the heliosphere's outer layers; and if it makes it inside, there is a thicket of magnetic fields waiting to scatter and deflect the intruder.

At times of low solar activity, this natural shielding is weakened, and more cosmic rays are able to reach the inner solar system," explains Pesnell.

Mewaldt lists three aspects of the current solar minimum that are combining to create the perfect storm:

1. The sun's magnetic field is weak. "There has been a sharp decline in the sun's interplanetary magnetic field down to 4 nT (nanoTesla) from typical values of 6 to 8 nT," he says. "This record-low interplanetary magnetic field undoubtedly contributes to the record-high cosmic ray fluxes." [data]

2. The solar wind is flagging. "Measurements by the Ulysses spacecraft show that solar wind pressure is at a 50-year low," he continues, "so the magnetic bubble that protects the solar system is not being inflated as much as usual." A smaller bubble gives cosmic rays a shorter-shot into the solar system. Once a cosmic ray enters the solar system, it must "swim upstream" against the solar wind. Solar wind speeds have dropped to very low levels in 2008 and 2009, making it easier than usual for a cosmic ray to proceed. [data]

3. The current sheet is flattening. Imagine the sun wearing a ballerina's skirt as wide as the entire solar system with an electrical current flowing along its wavy folds. It's real, and it's called the "heliospheric current sheet," a vast transition zone where the polarity of the sun's magnetic field changes from plus to minus. The current sheet is important because cosmic rays are guided by its folds. Lately, the current sheet has been flattening itself out, allowing cosmic rays more direct access to the inner solar system.

"If the flattening continues, we could see cosmic ray fluxes jump all the way to 30% above previous Space Age highs," predicts Mewaldt. [data]

Earth is in no great peril. Our planet's atmosphere and magnetic field provide some defense against the extra cosmic rays. Indeed, we've experienced much worse in the past. Hundreds of years ago, cosmic ray fluxes were at least 200% to 300% higher than anything measured during the Space Age. Researchers know this because when cosmic rays hit the atmosphere, they produce an isotope of beryllium, 10Be, which is preserved in polar ice. By examining ice cores, it is possible to estimate cosmic ray fluxes more than a thousand years into the past. Even with the recent surge, cosmic rays today are much weaker than they have been at times in the past millennium. [data]

"The space era has so far experienced a time of relatively low cosmic ray activity," says Mewaldt. "We may now be returning to levels typical of past centuries."

NASA spacecraft will continue to monitor the situation as solar minimum unfolds. Stay tuned for updates. - Dr. Tony Phillips, Science@NASA

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Cosmic rays and manned space travel

Galactic Center as seen from Fermi Telescope (All-Sky, first light, 2008) "Cosmic rays were discovered in 1912 by Victor Hess. He was trying to test the theory that most of the Earth's radioactivity came from the ground, so he took three detectors up to 5300 meters in a hot air balloon, expecting a decrease in the ionization rate. Instead, he found an increase, indicating the primary source of radiation was coming not from below, but from above. Hess thought that he was observing high energy photons, hence the name "cosmic rays." When a cosmic ray strikes a molecule in the atmosphere, it produces a cascade of lighter particles. Initial collisions produce exotic particles like pions, but by the time the shower has reached the ground, these particles have decayed, and we're generally left with several common byproducts -- muons, electrons, neutrons, neutrinos, and gamma rays." (Icecube.wisc.edu) Beyond Earth's atmosphere, at the mercy of the Sun's interplanetary magnetic field and that of Earth, in "deep space," astronauts are assessed individually to determine their risk, over a lifetime, of Radiation Exposure Induced Death, or "REID." When that risk reaches four percent, they are grounded.

Too much radiation for astronauts to make it to Mars

David Shiga
New Scientist

"FORGET the risk of exploding rockets or getting sideswiped by a wayward bit of space junk. Radiation may be the biggest hurdle to human exploration beyond low-Earth orbit and could put a damper on a recently proposed mission to Mars orbit."

Read that story HERE, or...

Joel Raupe
Lunar Pioneer Research Group

Why Norm Augustine’s Review of Human Space Flight committee reportedly included in their report to the President a trip to Phobos, and lingering in Mars orbit twenty years from now, among their possible long-term alternatives to a more immediate return to the Moon is a mystery to us.

Like everyone else we will have to wait for a closer look at the Committee’s final report. This is because the Lunar Pioneers have been echoing conclusions affirmed and reaffirmed by experts over decades, that manned spaceflight beyond our Moon is unlikely to become safe anytime soon without the kinds of technological breakthroughs we believe only frequent travel to the Moon is likely to make possible.

There is no question of our capability of going to Mars, and the Pioneers estimate the trip would not have to be nearly as expensive as estimated. Returning safely from Mars, if by “safely” you mean “alive,” is also very doable. But there is one problem we have yet to learn our way around.

Radiation Exposure Induced Death, or “REID.”

If you want to go to Mars, you will need nuclear energy or something faster and more sustained than your grandfather’s chemical rockets. Otherwise the dangers posed by Galactic Cosmic Rays, or "GCR's," is both real and unavoidable.

One practical kind of shielding might be an 11-meter thick shell of lunar regolith.

This reality was explicitly highlighted in two reports chartered by NASA and delivered by the National Academy of Sciences following President George W. Bush’s establishment of the Vision for Space Exploration as national policy in 2004.

In the very influential "Scientific Context for the Exploration of the Moon" - Final Report (2007), and, in more detail, “Managing Space Radiation Risk in the New Era of Space Exploration” (2008), the Space Studies Board used NASA’s own measure of radiation exposure risk assessment as the gauge, and their conclusions were clear.

Every astronaut is individually assessed, based on their age and lifetime experience, living or flying at high altitudes, or how often they flew using polar routes, etc., and the probabilities are crunched to come up with that person’s own lifetime risk of Radiation Exposure Induced Death, or “REID.” Anytime a prospective space flight is estimated to take an astronaut beyond a 4 percent probability of REID, they are grounded.

In fact, your career is likely over long before reaching a 3 percent lifetime risk of REID.

Interestingly, the older you are, with only a moderate estimated time at high altitude during your lifetime, the lower the REID, because The Great Bird of the Galaxy is going to catch up with you a lot sooner from one of the many "manifold dooms" than when you were a adolescent. The risk is estimated on a cumulative basis, so an individual astronaut’s risk of REID is proportionally lower then if they had traveled in space beginning at a younger age.

Back in the Apollo Era the danger people at home worried about most was presented by the Sun and solar flares, and not without some reason. But the danger we can’t get around when traveling beyond the Moon is not coming from the Sun.

Solar radiation and solar particle events (SPEs) are hazardous to your health, but the kinds of shielding, comparable to hull materials measured in units of aluminum per square centimeter has proven to actually provide a high degree of protection from the Sun’s most common dangers.

The dangerous radiation that concerns scientists today when we talk about deep space travel and human health is far more energetic, even if it is less frequent, immediate, or even apparent to the human eye.

If you had gamma ray eyes, you could see the problem all over the sky, just like the Fermi Telescope launched in 2008; along the band of the Milky Way, from supernovae remnants like the Crab, or a curiously swath with no apparent origin coming at us from the area of sky northeast of Orion. Generally speaking, however, Cosmic rays rain down at us from every possible direction.

Astrobiology magazine discussed the culprit in a quick overview of recent advances in ground-based Cosmic ray shadow detection, and provocatively entitled “Death Rays from Space.”

"Cosmic rays are mostly high-energy protons, with some electrons, positrons and heavy nuclei mixed in. Their energies range over 14 orders of magnitude, with the most energetic cosmic rays flaunting a billion times more energy than is possible in man-made particle accelerators on Earth.

“The current understanding is that most cosmic rays originate in the shock waves that emanate from supernova explosions. We can't precisely trace where a cosmic ray came from because its trajectory is bent by magnetic fields. In fact, a typical cosmic ray will bounce inside the galaxy's magnetic field for millions of years before eventually colliding with something… like Earth.

"Every square centimeter on the top of the Earth's atmosphere is hit by several cosmic rays per second," and, "this is forever going on."

“None of these "primary" cosmic rays ever reach us on the ground. Instead, they collide with atoms in the upper atmosphere, creating a shower of lower energy "secondary" particles.

Secondary effects

“At sea level, the majority of cosmic ray secondaries are highly penetrating muons. About 10,000 muons pass through our bodies every minute. Some of these muons will ionize molecules as they go through our flesh, occasionally leading to genetic mutations that may be harmful.

“At present, the average human receives the equivalent of about 10 chest X-rays per year from cosmic rays. We shouldn't be alarmed by this, since it is just part of the natural background radiation under which humans and our ancestors have been exposed to for eons. Indeed, cosmic-ray-induced mutations may sometimes be beneficial,”
All of which is true, we suppose, if you think in terms only of your species, and never traveling beyond the blue sky. Our best estimates are that every person on-board a vessel traveling to Mars and back, however, using present-day shielding and our best possible speeds, return to Earth with a greater than 4 percent chance of eventually dying of radiation induced death.

To make things tougher, the hull design most likely to shield you from the Sun’s worst punches is very likely to worsen the danger posed by Cosmic rays. A metallic nucleon, atomic Iron or Beryllium, or whatever, would encounter the same degree of Aluminum per square centimeter and immediately become a shotgun spray of secondary and tertiary particles, about the size of your head, and multiplying the genetic risk proportionally.

It takes a lot to stop the highest energy Cosmic rays.

To make things even tougher still, although it is unlikely to last forever, we are presently experiencing the deepest solar minimum since 1913. At solar maximum, when the interplanetary magnetic field is at its greatest strength, incidence of Cosmic rays at Earth is reduced by as much as 60 percent.

Alternatively, we are at the present solar minimum, and after fifty years of monitoring the cosmic ray bombardment here at one-Earth distance from the Sun, we discover that the incidence of Cosmic rays today are at their highest sustained levels ever recorded. The last such peak recorded was of a far shorter duration and happened during the solar minimum of the middle 1960’s.

Obviously, now would not a good time to travel to Mars. So, what about the Moon?

For those who want to go to Mars the problem of REID must be tackled, and the Moon, as always, waits patiently to provide an excellent testing ground, with many necessary materials already in place.

Standing on the Moon, during those three-quarters of a lunar day periods when the Moon is not within trailing field lines of Earth’s magnetic field, half the incoming Cosmic radiation is blocked by the Moon itself, at your feet. To retreat entirely from this radiation would require, some estimate, at least 11 meters of lunar regolith, all around you. This is a difficult, but not impossible, proposition.

Transported through deep space surrounded by 11 meters of lunar quick-crete might seem prohibitive if launched from Earth. But, using rail-gun technology, such a feat might not seem so ridiculous beginning from the Moon.

Like the Moon, Cosmic rays presents the space wanderer with an immovable object,"so high you can't get over it, so low, you can't go under it, so wide, you can't go 'round it... must go through that door."

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Cosmic Ray flux highest ever recorded

The percentage of Cosmic Rays repelled by the Interplanetary (Solar) Magnetic Field, as recorded continuously over fifty years at the Moscow Neutron Monitor. [Monthly resolution corrected for changes in atmospheric pressure.] Detail of 2009, upper right, is shown in a similarly generated plot at the end of this post.

Joel Raupe
Lunar Pioneer Research Group

Without the Sun's magnetic field, it is believed, in-falling of "Galactic" Cosmic Rays (GCRs) at Earth arriving from every direction from outside the solar system is more or less constant.

If true, the evidence may be uncovered eventually by the twin U.S. probes Voyager-1 and Voyager-2 expected to reach interstellar space and beyond the influence of the Sun's interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) in five to eight years.

At its most active, at solar maximum, cosmic rays of a very wide variety, in mass and energy, are deflected from the inner solar system by the Sun when passing perpendicularly to the lines of force of its magnetic field. At these times, at the peak of the Sun's Sunspot Cycle, more than half of these highly ionizing and often very heavy atomic nuclei are kept from reaching the inner Solar System.

Put another way, at solar minimum a background Cosmic Ray flux impending on the inner solar system increases by more than 100 percent.

At the moment the Sun's remains in an unusual and lengthy quiet spell surpassed in the record book of the past hundred years only by the solar minima of 1913.

Since 1958, originally set up by the Soviet Union in celebration of the International Geophysical Year, the Moscow Neutron Monitor has continuously measured variations from an average background neutron flux as a method to gauge the strength of the Sun's interplanetary magnetic field. A haze of neutrons not otherwise associated with other celestial objects (like the Galactic Disk) is one remnant of those cosmic rays that manage to reach Earth's atmosphere, where they meet their doom, becoming short-lived aerosols or added electrical charge in the lower atmosphere. There is evidence and theory of more profound effects, as well.

The chart above begins a minute before midnight December 31, 1958 and runs through August 31, 2009, or 50.67 years (18,506 days). The website of the MNM invites users to similarly plot this percentage of variation over any period or resolution within their 51 year dataset.

The chart demonstrates an inverse relationship with the Sunspot Cycle, going up when the Sun is quiet, as it is today, and down when the Sun is magnetically active at solar maximum. It is not a measure irradiance (which seems to varie no more than a tenth of a percent during the Solar Cycle.)

Sunspots and the Solar Cycle are outward manifestations of a torturous process underway as the Sun is forced to change the polarity of it's magnetic field by an uneven rotation, and repelling of highly ionizing GCRs depends upon that fields strength, extent and continuity.

Fortunately, there are more direct detectors of Cosmic Rays besides Earth-bound neutron detectors that can only indicate GCR flux by inference. Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 are "just years away," we believe, from directly measuring these curious particles and their rates of incidence beyond the noisy Sun. Both imaging systems were shut down years ago but on-board experiments are collecting data, among these are Cosmic Ray Subsystems. Every six hours the aging probes, each powered by three radioisotope thermal generators, record the rate of ionizing atomic nuclei that populate two classes: those with energies greater than 500 keV and those with energies greater than 70 MeV. As of May 2009 Voyager-1 was 16.4 billion km (110 AU) from the Sun as Voyager-2 reached 13.3 billion km (89 AU). Voyager-1 crossed the termination shock, the beginning of the end of the solar wind and the IMF in 2004, at ~ 94 AU, and Voyager-2 crossed this area in 2007 at ~84 AU (confirming theories of the "squashed" shape of the heliosphere. Both are expected to reach interstellar space in 5 to 8 years. Strangely (or not) this plot of Voyager-1 data of encounters with nucleon with energies >500 keV is considered "a good indicator of GCR activity" by the present-day Voyager team. A less rapid change occurred near the time the Moscow Neutron Monitor data inferred an increase in GCRs in the inner solar system. In the outer solar system, Voyager-1 data seem s to show a recent decline, perhaps showing the effect of a fluttering solar wind at its extremes. Similar plots made over the same period showing one year of nucleon at higher energies (>70 MeV /nuc ion) show a slow but steady increase. Only time and patience, and the continued good health of the thirty-year-old Voyagers may tell if these data show a steady but declining influence from the Sun with increasing distance or a true measurable variation in Cosmic Ray flux outside the interplanetary magnetic field.


At the present time the Sun's magnetic field is as weak as has ever been accurately recorded, having recently surpassed the length and magnitude of the former record-holding weak moment in the Sun's IMF back in 1964.

Though the Sun's present unusually long solar minimum has been well-noted, the Home Star had been interpreted as showing signs and sputters heralding, finally, a poorly-predicted beginning of Solar Cycle 24; increased activity ahead of the next solar maximum finally underway that revised predictions now show occurring in 2013.

If the Moscow chart at the beginning of this thread and measurements of the IMF are bona fide indication of the Sun's changing mood, however, it has never been recorded as more gloomy. The IMF met and then surpassed the weak plateau in solar activity from 1964 only recently, in the past few months, after the nadir out of this present solar minimum was thought to have occurred.

Perhaps it is all normal, or at least not atypical. Closer study is needed to show how closely the percentage of neutron flux variation match data from other indicators of solar activity (and inactivity).

As seen on the graph at the top, (but easier at the MNM website) 1959 began with neutron flux repelled by the IMF by less than 12 percent, corresponding to an active Sun slowly quieting after the strong solar maximum in 1954. The repelling of cosmic rays then appears to fall off data collection continued through a deep solar minimum between 1964-65. The highest horizontal dotted line on the graph at the top of this page represents a mean, or "Zero Percent" variation in the background of neutrons detected.

After reaching that earlier recorded low in GCR deflection recorded in 1964, the Sun rapidly fires up for a peak just in time for the Apollo missions, and man's first voyages outside Earth's own magnetic field. Solar Particle Events (SPEs), Coronal Mass Ejections and such, occur at any time in the a Solar Cycle, but are admittedly more common and energetic when Sunspot numbers are high, and the Solar Cycle peak in 1968 did, in fact, worry Apollo planners.

Additional research done by NASA and the Department of Energy, in Space and on Earth in the years since has changed thinking about the real dangers of ionizing radiation for space travelers. An active Sun may make the situation less dangerous, as it turns out.

An active Sunspot maximum does not pose the greatest hazard to astronauts in Deep Space. It would be confirmed that the aluminum alloy hull of the Apollo command module and that of the Space Shuttle actually offered good protection from most effects of solar activity. And the Sun's strong interplanetary magnetic field repells 50 to 60 percent of GCRs.

Because Cosmic Rays are dangerous and can't yet be practically shielded against. A very high energy ionizing iron nucleon, for example, is not stopped by those aluminum hulls. Instead these heavy particles simply shatter and become instead miniature showers of secondary and tertiary ionizing radiation that quickly spreads into a cone the size of a human head, or torso.

Rather than being unnecessarily worried about the danger posed by an active Sun, NASA's researchers are now concerned more by energetic, ionizing cosmic rays. An active Sun may be a Deep Space astronaut's best friend, warding off microscopic energetic atomic nuclei that pack a wallop without being immediately felt.


For more than a year, while closely monitoring other indicators of solar activity, a slow negative trend in neutron flux seemed to indicate the present long solar minimum was at last coming to an end. But in April the Interplanetary Magnetic Field noticeably retreated over mere hours. The neutron flux variation has since lingered in unfamiliar territory, actually 2 to 6 percent more than average, perhaps corresponding to a greater cosmic ray incidence and breaking and exceeding the 1964 record. [Resolution plotted hourly; corrected for atmospheric pressure.]


(NOTE: This is posting number 1,500 at the
Lunar Pioneer/Lunar Networks Service Blog)