Why the Moon looms large on the horizon: Binocular disparity as an explanation for the moon illusion

Is the Moon really larger at the horizon than overhead, or is this an illusion, created in our heads? [Photograph by Robert Arn, AstroArn Photography].

Joseph Antonides, Toshiro Kubota

We present another explanation for the moon illusion, in which the moon looks larger near the horizon than near the zenith. In our model, the sky is considered a spatially contiguous and geometrically smooth surface. When an object (like the moon) breaks the contiguity of the surface, humans perceive an occlusion of the surface rather than an object appearing through a hole. Binocular vision dictates that the moon is distant, but this perception model dictates that the moon is closer than the sky. To solve the dilemma, the brain distorts the projections of the moon to increase the binocular disparity, which results in increase of the angular size of the moon. The degree of the distortion depends upon the apparent distance to the sky, which is influenced by the surrounding objects and the condition of the sky. The closer the sky appears, the stronger the illusion. At the zenith, few distance cues are present, causing difficulty with distance estimation and weakening the illusion.

Read the research paper, HERE.

News story with commentary from MIT: "Moon illusion: New theory reignites debate over why Moon appears larger near the horizon," The Physics arXiv Blog, January 17, 2013

Full Moon rises over the ruins of the Temple of Poseidon, Cape Sounion, 69 km south-southeast of Athens, southernmost tip of the Attica peninsula in Greece. Seventeen sequential images by John Doukoumopoulos, June 18, 2008 [Lunar Picture of the Day (LPOD), June 20, 2008].

Activity on the Moon: Transient Lunar Phenomena

At local sunrise Aristarchus (r) and the southern boundary ridge of its namesake plateau catch the advancing terminator long before the surrounding plain of Oceanus Procellarum. The Copernican-age crater, its bright interior and ejecta, much younger than its ancient companion Herodotus (l), is the number one location for reports of Transient Lunar Phenomena (TLP). At the same time, the basalt plains immediately south of the plateau, are estimated to be the youngest mare segment on the entire Moon [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].

Cruz Roa & Andr es Felipe
University of Tolima
Astronomy Group Urania Scorpius
Ibague, Tolima, Colombia

Transient Lunar Phenomena (TLP) observed on the surface of the moon, are of high rarity, low repetition rate and very short observation times, resulting in that there is little information about this topic. This necessitates the importance of studying them in detail. They have been observed as very bright clouds of gases of past geological lunar activity. According its duration, there have been registered in di erent colors (yellow, orange, red). Its size can vary from a few to hundreds of kilometers. The TLP Usually occur in certain locations as in some craters (Aristarchus, Plato, Kepler, etc.) and at the edges of lunar maria (Sea of Fecundity, Alps hills area, etc.). The exposure time of a TLP can vary from a few seconds to a little more than one hour.

In this paper, a literature review of the TLP is made to build a theory from the existing reports and scienti c hypotheses, trying to unify and synthesize data and concepts that are scattered by di erent lunar research lines. The TLP need to be explained from celestial mechanics and planetary astrophysics to explain the possible causes from phenomena such as outgassing moon, moonquakes and the gravitational interaction. Extrapolating these hypothetical physical knowledge, arguments are exposed for Lunar degassing theory showing this as the most consistent. It's build also a the theory of how to observe, describe, explain and predict the TLP.

Read the research paper (pdf), HERE.

Lunar accretion from a Roche-interior fluid disk

Julien Salmon, Robin M. Canup
arXiv 1210.0932 v.1

We use a hybrid numerical approach to simulate the formation of the Moon from an impact-generated disk, consisting of a fluid model for the disk inside the Roche limit and an N-body code to describe accretion outside the Roche limit. As the inner disk spreads due to a thermally regulated viscosity, material is delivered across the Roche limit and accretes into moonlets that are added to the N-body simulation. Contrary to an accretion timescale of a few months obtained with prior pure N-body codes, here the final stage of the Moon's growth is controlled by the slow spreading of the inner disk, resulting in a total lunar accretion timescale of ~10^2 years. It has been proposed that the inner disk may compositionally equilibrate with the Earth through diffusive mixing, which offers a potential explanation for the identical oxygen isotope compositions of the Earth and Moon. However, the mass fraction of the final Moon that is derived from the inner disk is limited by resonant torques between the disk and exterior growing moons. For initial disks containing < 2.5 lunar masses (ML), we find that a final Moon with mass > 0.8ML contains < 60% material derived from the inner disk, with this material preferentially delivered to the Moon at the end of its accretion.

Download, read and review the paper, HERE.

Toxicity of lunar dust

Gene Cernan, soon after the completion of the third and last EVA of Apollo 17, also the final EVA of the Apollo program. His moon suit carries a heavy accumulation of lunar dust, as does his skin. Three years earlier mission planners had been worried about astronauts, along with their spacecraft, sinking into the accumulation of dust on the surface. After Apollo, and decades later, mitigating the clinging affect of dust on equipment and human life remains a problem evading easy solution [Schmitt/AS17-145-22224].

Dag Linnarsson, et al.
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm/ESA

Abstract - The formation, composition and physical properties of lunar dust are incompletely characterized with regard to human health. While the physical and chemical determinants of dust toxicity for materials such as asbestos, quartz, volcanic ashes and urban particulate matter have been the focus of substantial research efforts, lunar dust properties, and therefore lunar dust toxicity may differ substantially. In this contribution, past and ongoing work on dust toxicity is reviewed, and major knowledge gaps that prevent an accurate assessment of lunar dust toxicity are identified. Finally, a range of studies using ground-based, low-gravity, and in situ measurements is recommended to address the identified knowledge gaps. Because none of the curated lunar samples exist in a pristine state that preserves the surface reactive chemical aspects thought to be present on the lunar surface, studies using this material carry with them considerable uncertainty in terms of fidelity. As a consequence, in situ data on lunar dust properties will be required to provide ground truth for ground-based studies quantifying the toxicity of dust exposure and the associated health risks during future manned lunar missions.

Introduction - The current renewed interest in human exploration of the Moon is driven not only by an urge to expand the human presence to other celestial bodies, but also by genuine scientific interest. Many aspects of the origin and evolution of the Earth and the other bodies in our solar system remain unclear. The Moon is thought to hold important information about the time when our own planet was formed, and humans remain capable of much more intelligent and adaptive exploration of the Moon than even the most sophisticated robotic and remote-controlled devices (e.g., Crawford et al., 2012). Identification and retrieval of representative or exotic mineral specimens, and drilling deep into the lunar subsurface are examples of tasks for which astronauts are superior to machines. The most compelling argument for human exploration is the unique ability of humans to identify and quickly assess the unexpected, enabling real time adjustment of a pre-planned exploration strategy.

Although humans have landed on and returned from the Moon during the Apollo era, it is still a formidable challenge to secure the health and safety of astronauts during Moon missions. Challenges for future missions include long-term low- or microgravity, radiation exposure, and the maintenance of a number of life support systems during a much longer period than was the case during the Apollo flights (e.g., Cain, 2010, 2011).

One of the biggest challenges may be related to the presence of dust on the lunar surface. The ubiquity of fine dust particles on the surface of the Moon plays an important and often dual role in many aspects of human lunar exploration. On the one hand, identifying the mineralogical and chemical composition of the dust fraction of lunar soils can provide in situ geological context for both robotic and human landing sites. In addition, lunar dust may be an ideal starting material for a range of future in situ resource utilization activities on the Moon (e.g., Taylor et al., 2005), and dust is an important component of the lunar exosphere (Horanyi and Stern, 2011).

On the other hand, dust can adversely affect the performance of scientific and life-support instruments on the lunar surface. Fine dust was spread over all parts of the Apollo astronauts space suits, ending up in the habitat (Figure 1a), resulting in astronaut exposure times of several days. The Apollo astronauts reported undesirable effects affecting the skin, eyes and airways that could be related to exposure to the dust that had adhered to their space suits during their extravehicular activities, and was subsequently brought into their spacecraft (Figure 1b).

Figure 2. Steps of cell and tissue interaction with nano and micron-sized particles in the lung. When attained the alveolar space the particle may react with endogenous molecules (step 1). The particle may then be cleared out of the lung either through the mucociliary escalator (step 2) or through alveolar macrophage (AM) clearance (step 3). If reactive, AM activation will follow with release of several factors and recruitment of other immune cells (AM and polymorphonucleate cells, PMN), eventual cell death and establishment of permanent cycles of ingestion (step 4). This process produces chronic inflammation (step 5). Combined with the direct action of the particle (step 6) this will cause damage to the target cells (epithelial, endothelial). If the particle is nano-sized, it may easily escape from the lung to the pleura and to systemic circulation (step 7).

Figure 3. The role of particle and cell derived free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cell damage, oxidative stress and diseases.

Dust exposure and inhalation could have a range of toxic effects on human lunar explorers, especially if longer exposure times become the norm during future manned exploration missions. There is therefore a need to assess the risks to health. The physical and chemical determinants of dust toxicity for terrestrial materials such as asbestos, quartz, volcanic ashes and urban particulate matter have been studied in great detail, and lunar dust simulant (synthesized from terrestrial volcanic material) has been found to exhibit toxic effects (Lam et al., 2002; Latch et al., 2008; Loftus et al., 2010). Unique features of actual lunar dust (described in more detail in section 3), resulting from its formation by (micro)meteoroid impacts and its extended radiation exposure in the absence of oxygen and humidity, could lead to toxic effects significantly exceeding those of simulants made from Earth materials. At present, the formation, composition and physical properties of lunar dust remain incompletely characterized with regard to human health.

In a micro-/hypo-gravity environment the risk of inhalation of dust is increased due to reduced gravity-induced sedimentation. Inhaled particles tend to deposit more peripherally and thus may be retained in the lungs for longer periods in reduced gravity as will be the case in a future lunar habitat (Darquenne and Prisk, 2008; Peterson et al., 2008). Inhalation of particles of varying size may affect the respiratory and cardiovascular systems in deleterious ways leading to airway inflammation and increased respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity (Frampton et al., 2006; Sundblad et al., 2002).

In this contribution, we review our knowledge of the physical chemistry determinants of dust toxicity, of the composition and size of lunar dust, and all aspects related to its toxicity. We identify a number of knowledge gaps that need to be filled to constrain the required extent of mitigation activities protecting astronauts from the potentially toxic effects of lunar dust during and after a stay on the Moon. We also recommend a range of future studies using ground-based, low-gravity, and in situ measurements on the lunar surface to better constrain lunar dust toxicity.

arXiv:1206.6328 (v.1)
62 pg. (PDF)

Space Exploration: A Job for Humans

Admiral Alan B. Shepard, Jr. (1923-1998),  U.S. Navy aviator by profession and cattle farmer by avocation, a few weeks shy of 10 years after becoming the first American in Space. On the afternoon of January 31, 1971 he suits up for only his second space flight, as commander of Apollo 14 and destined to become only the fifth person to explore the surface of the Moon [NASA].

Jared Keller
Atlantic

The conventional wisdom of space exploration suggests that robotic probes are both more scientifically efficient and cost effective. Not so, argues a professor of planetary science.

When the Space Shuttle Atlantis rolled to a stop in July 2011, NASA bid farewell to the nation's symbol of manned spaceflight. The Obama administration has scrapped NASA's plan to return humans to the Moon by 2020, which was behind schedule because of technical and budgetary problems. As financial constraints threaten the possibility of future ventures into outer space, many in the astronomical community are advocating for the increased use of unmanned robotic space, arguing that they will serve as more efficient explorers of planetary surfaces than astronauts. The next giant leap, then, will be taken with robotic feet.

Dr. Ian A. Crawford thinks it should be otherwise. A professor of planetary sciences at Birkbeck College, London, Crawford makes the case for human space exploration in a new paper entitled Dispelling the myth of robotic efficiency: why human space exploration will tell us more about the Solar System than will robotic exploration alone, published recently in the journal Astronomy and Geophysics. If the goal of space travel is to expand our knowledge of the universe, argues Dr. Crawford, exploration will be most effective when carried out by astronauts rather than robots on the surface of a planet.

Read the feature article HERE.

Preventing Columbia-Class disaster with photogrammetry and high-flying projectile ballistic analysis

Technology Review
arXiv Blog

When and if the Large Hadron Collider finally rumbles into action, it will produce a firehose of data like nothing physicists have ever seen. Ths data will consists if the tracks from the debris from roughly a billion collisions per second, as measured by particle detectors clustered around the collision sites.

That's far too much data to analyse in detail, so most of will be simply discarded using a simple filtering system that looks for trajectories of interest and stores them. That process should end up filtering roughly a hundred events per second for later detailed analysis. And all this must be done in real time, since any delay would rapidly overwhelm what buffering facility the accelerator has.

So what's all this got to do with the space shuttle? It turns out that a group of engineers at NASA want to use a similar mechanism to analyze the trajectory of debris around the space shuttle as it takes off. Their goal is to use the trajectory of these debris particles to work out their mass and density and also to trace their origin. With the right kind of analysis, it ought to be possible to flag up potentially damaging trajectories as they occur.

There's no need to to spell out why that's important, but here goes. In 2003, the impact of debris with the space shuttle Columbia during launch, so damaged the vehicle that it was unable to survive re-entry. A better analysis of that incident might have identified the extend of the damage and so prevented the loss of that shuttle.

Philip Metzger at the Kennedy Space Center and buddies have built the first stage of a filtering system that could do that job in real time using a pair of cameras that take high resolution of the launch from different angles. Together,this footage gives a 3D view of the launch allowing a computer to reconstruct the trajectory of any debris.That's not rocket science but, strangely, it has never been used to analyse launches.

Metzger and co have put their idea through its paces by analysing a piece of debris thrown up during the launch of STS-124, in May 2008. At the time, NASA engineers worried that this debris was a brick from a flame trench beneath the shuttle. A brick hitting the shuttle during launch could have caused significant damage.

The new technique, however, shows that the debris particle is low density foam, almost certainly from the solid rocket booster throat plug. This would have posed little threat to the shuttle.

Of course, coming to that conclusion, a year later is of little use to the shuttle crew who need to assess the conditioning of their vehicle almost immediately and certainly before they embark on re-entry.

That's where the LHC-like filtering mechanism comes in. Metzger at al say the data is easy to collect using their two cameras but the trouble is combing through it for interesting and useful insights. An LHC-like filtering system would simply comb through it during the launch and filter out only those debris tracks that are dense and massive enough to pose a threat.

That could save lives and although the Shuttle is due to be retired by this time next year, the process could easily be applied to future rocket launches anywhere round the world.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0910.4357: Photogrammetry and Ballistic Analysis of a High-Flying Projectile in the STS-124 Space Shuttle Launch

A new chronology for the Moon and Mercury

Simone Marchi, et. al.

In this paper we present a new method for dating the surface of the Moon, obtained by modeling the incoming flux of impactors and converting it into a size distribution of resulting craters. We compare the results from this model with the standard chronology for the Moon showing their similarities and discrepancies. In particular, we find indications of a non-constant impactor flux in the last 500 Myr and also discuss the implications of our findings for the Late Heavy Bombardment hypothesis. We also show the potential of our model for accurate dating of other inner Solar System bodies, by applying it to Mercury.

arXiv-0903.5137