Showing posts with label Orbital Refueling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Orbital Refueling. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

New Gemini: Re-Thinking Heavy-Lift


Notional orbital propellant depots
- As millions who have flown to the Moon (without leaving their PC) using the popular DeltaGliderIV add-on to Martin Schweiger's acclaimed and free Orbital Simulator program know, it is "possible" to get there without using a heavy-lift booster. It is "just" possible, that is, though it does take practice and some knowledge of Von Braun's free-return trajectory.

Pulling this stunt off, in real time, for me at least, also requires an off-plain orbit change and subsequent rendezvous and docking with the magically restored Soviet Mir space station, conveniently parked in low-earth orbit, as near as possible to the orbital plain of the Moon.


With a replenished "fuel" tank, using the DeltaGliderIV, a pilot can then line up for trans-lunar injection, just like the Apollo-Saturn IVB configurations of yore, and arrive with a reasonable amount of crew and cargo for the low-energy (~800 m/s) orbital insertion burn behind the Moon, in 90 to 120 hours, again, just like Apollo. It is also possible to land at a precise location on the Moon, breaking orbit for a terminal insertion burn, make a pin-point landing and then return to lunar orbit and afterward accelerate for a two to three day return to Earth, just like Apollo.

Unlike Apollo, I have not succeeded in a direct re-entry at 25,000 mph. Either the vehicle or the pilot can't handle such a hairy maneuver, yet. Instead, I have successfully used what remained of the "vehicle's" fuel to reduce velocity while speeding up through what would otherwise be a hopeless Earth fly-by, from over 11,000 meters per second to the 7700 meters-plus per second velocity of low-earth orbit. I have then subsequently performed the tricky Shuttle-like "standard" re-entry maneuver and dead-weight runway landing.

If Orbital Simulator 2006 can be thought of as Martin Schweiger's "chalk board," a vehicle small enough to fit inside the cargo bay of the Space Shuttle can travel to the Moon, land and return to Earth. Without on-orbit fuel transfer, however, involving a rendezvous with a pre-fueled payload assist (PAM) rocket or a direct fuel transfer, the scenario described definitely requires an expensive, heavy-lift expendable booster.


Admittedly, on-orbit refueling after using more than half of a small vehicle's fuel capacity (to say the least) is science fiction, but no more than orbital rendezvous was equally problematic before the Gemini program (1965-1966). Unlike orbital rendezvous, which the United States, Russia and more recently the ESA have made appear easy, on-orbit refueling would not be a magic act. It requires more than a little appreciation for the delicacies and sensitivities of temperatures and couplings.

Or does it? The Constellation program, in a very real way, already features on-orbit refueling, using the rendezvous and docking with pre-positioned unmanned vehicles launched using unmanned heavy-lift boosters, like the Ariane V, or the Ares V now under development.

Long term, for manned space travel beyond low-Earth orbit to be less than prohibitively expensive, according the Second Augustine commission, may require a step beyond the Apollo-Saturn and Shuttle surplus idea to new, "perhaps" cheaper technologies. These won't be free R&D spin-offs, but the result of a deliberate program, probably as expensive as Gemini, to take orbital rendezvous past a dangerous, though logical, technological hurdle.


From Popular Mechanics and Rand Simberg

"It has long been conventional wisdom, going all the way back to Apollo, that heavy lift was a prerequisite for human exploration beyond low Earth orbit, but this summer has seen several cracks start to appear in that consensus. First, partly as a result of white papers circulated among its members in the last few weeks, the Augustine panel itself has championed the concept of propellant depots. But defenders of the current approach have claimed that the ideas aren't fleshed out, and are too complex and expensive. This week, at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics annual meeting on space in Pasadena, Calif., several technical papers have more to say on the subject of getting back to the moon with existing launch systems.

"While Boeing and Lockheed Martin can smell the Ares blood in the water, they still both have lucrative contracts for the Constellation program (Orion for Lockheed Martin, and the Ares I upper stage for Boeing), and they can't afford to upset the apple cart unless they know that the program is definitely dead. Three years ago, Lockheed Martin got itself into hot water with the former administrator, Mike Griffin, at the AIAA meeting in San Jose, where they held a joint press conference with Bigelow Aerospace announcing a study to "human rate" the Atlas V to service Bigelow's planned facilities. Griffin reportedly called upper management there to complain about the potential threat these plans posed to maintaining political support for Ares."

Read the full article HERE.

Monday, August 10, 2009

ULA proposed on-orbit re-fueling architecture

Lunar Pioneer Notional "Svoboda-Class" design concept for lunar missions (2003) presented architecture highly dependent on semi-robotic, on-orbit (LEO) refueling to enable travel to the Moon by vehicles order-of-magnitude smaller, and reusuable. (Planning continues).

Graham Warwick
Aviation Week

United Launch Alliance (ULA) is proposing on-orbit propellant depots to increase the capability of NASA’s Constellation exploration architecture. The plan to use depots derived from an advanced upper stage for the Atlas V and Delta IV evolved expandable launch vehicles (EELV) has caught the attention of the Augustine panel, which has included in-space refueling in four of seven options identified (see p. 29).

“Propellant depots divorce the launch from what we do in space,” says Bernard Kutter, ULA manager of advanced programs. “We can launch on smaller rockets and refuel in space.” The joint Boeing/Lockheed Martin company has proposed several different architectures. The simplest is a dual launch, with the propellant depot being launched first to wait for the payload stage and then transfer fuel in orbit.

This would increase payload to the lunar surface to more than 10 metric tons, and mass in transit to Mars by a factor of four, says Kutter, speaking at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics’ Joint Propulsion Conference in Denver on Aug. 3. “On-orbit top-off of the Earth departure stage and Altair lunar lander would significantly improve performance. Every 20 tons of fuel on-loaded would increase landed mass by 5 tons” or lower the cost of NASA’s planned Ares V heavy-lift launcher.

An alternative architecture proposed by ULA does not need the Ares V, instead using smaller EELV-class boosters such as Atlas V purchased competitively to launch the Orion crew vehicle and Delta IV the Altair lander to refuel in space and rendezvous in lunar orbit. The Constellation architecture weighs 150 tons in orbit, 100 tons of which is propellant, Kutter says, and four missions a year “would open up a huge new market,” with higher propellant launch tempos stimulating competition.

Depots could be derived from the existing Centaur and planned advanced cryogenic upper stages for the EELV. The advanced stage would be designed to minimize heat transfer and propellant boil-off for extended operations in space. The depot additionally would be able to deploy a conical sunshield to fully encapsulate the tanks. “We can build a near-term depot without resorting to extreme, zero boil-off designs,” says Kutter.

To enable the depot concept, ULA is working with NASA on an experiment, called CryoTE, to demonstrate cryogenic fluid transfer in orbit using a secondary payload on an Atlas V. After deployment of the satellite, propellant would be transferred back and forth between the Centaur and CryoTE, which would then be released to operate independently in orbit for a time. If funded, the mission could take place in 2012, says Kutter.

The advanced upper stage that would form the basis for a propellant depot is one of a series of upgrades planned or proposed for Atlas V and Delta IV following the U.S. Air Force’s decision to keep EELVs in service to 2030.

Phase 1 involves standardization of the Delta IV fleet with the uprated Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) RS-68A rocket engine. The RS-68A, with improved main injector and turbopump, producing 6% more thrust and 5-10-sec. higher specific impulse, is under development to upgrade the Delta IV Heavy for an initial launch capability in 2011. A common booster core outfitted with the RS-68A will be used for the Delta IV Medium and Medium-Plus beginning in 2014, reducing booster cost and improving launch manifest flexibility, says James Sponnick, vice president for Delta programs.

Phase 2 involves a common upper stage. The original plan was to go straight to the advanced upper stage, but funding forced ULA to take the interim step of porting the Centaur cryogenic upper stage over to the Delta IV from the Atlas V. “We need to recapitalize our avionics and upper stage in the 2015 timeframe, and increasing the production rate for a more common upper stage will ensure the health of our industrial base,” says Mark Wilkins, vice president for Atlas programs.

An updated Centaur with PWR RL10A-4-2 engine will be used for both the Atlas V and the Delta IV with 4-meter-dia. upper stage, while the existing RL10B-powered 5-meter cryogenic stage will be retained for the Delta IV Heavy. “This will set the stage for the next-generation replacement for the RL10, and reduce the number of payload fairing configurations,” says Wilkins. “We are working on the advanced upper stage design, but waiting on the market.”

Phase 3 of the EELV upgrade plan is based around development of a new U.S.-designed liquid-oxygen/kerosene main engine to replace the Russian-supplied RD-180 used in the Atlas IV. The Air Force Research Laboratory is planning a hydrocarbon booster demonstration in 2018, and if the new engine is used in Atlas V, it would pave the way for its use in the reusable booster system (RBS) that could replace the EELV after 2030. The RBS would have reusable first and expendable second stages.

Read the full article HERE.